Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: pipe_tasks
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:6
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:DRP F18-4
-
Team:Data Release Production
Description
DM-4878 added a mechanism for propagating flags from the input catalogues to the coadd catalogue indicating stars that were used for measuring the PSF. Since then, DM-9050 added similar calibration flags for astrometry and photometry which should also be added to the list of flags that get propagated from visits to coadds.
The default list of propagated flags is currently:
flags = DictField(keytype=str, itemtype=float,
|
default={"calib_psf_candidate": 0.2, "calib_psf_used": 0.2, },
|
doc="Source catalog flags to propagate, with the threshold of relative occurrence.")
|
Please add the following to this list:
- calib_astrometry_used
- calib_photometry_used
- calib_photometry_reserved
Attachments
Issue Links
Activity
Watchers | John Swinbank, Lauren MacArthur [ John Swinbank, Lauren MacArthur ] | John Swinbank, Lauren MacArthur, Yusra AlSayyad [ John Swinbank, Lauren MacArthur, Yusra AlSayyad ] |
Risk Score | 0 |
Status | To Do [ 10001 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Description |
The default list of propagated flags is currently: {code} flags = DictField(keytype=str, itemtype=float, default={"calib_psfCandidate": 0.2, "calib_psfUsed": 0.2, }, doc="Source catalog flags to propagate, with the threshold of relative occurrence.") {code} Please add the following to this list: - calib_astrometryUsed - calib_photometryUsed - calib_photometryReserved |
The default list of propagated flags is currently: {code}flags = DictField(keytype=str, itemtype=float, default={"calib_psf_candidate": 0.2, "calib_psf_used": 0.2, }, doc="Source catalog flags to propagate, with the threshold of relative occurrence.") {code} Please add the following to this list: - calib_astrometry_used - calib_photometry_used - calib_photometry_reserved |
Reviewers | Meredith Rawls [ mrawls ] | |
Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | In Review [ 10004 ] |
Story Points | 2 |
Status | In Review [ 10004 ] | Reviewed [ 10101 ] |
Sprint | DRP F18-4 [ 774 ] |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Reviewed [ 10101 ] | Done [ 10002 ] |
Story Points | 2 | 6 |
Epic Link |
|
Would you mind giving this a look? Seeing as you have been poking around the plots from pipe_analysis, you understand the motivation.
Unit testing is not really feasible as we need a fully processed (through multiband) dataset, so I added a test in ci_hsc.
The PR for pipe_tasks (which is not showing up in Jira these days) is: https://github.com/lsst/pipe_tasks/pull/217
I ran a Jenkins run before the weekend which passed. Just to be on the safe side, I also kicked one off today [UPDATE: it also passed].
Oh, and I also created a coadd and checked that the sources that get these flags set do indeed look sensible.