Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-12314

Generalize ap_pipe to multiple visits

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

      Description

      Currently, ap_pipe assumes that each dataId passed to it contains exactly one visit (e.g., in doProcessCcd). ap_pipe should be extended to support ranges and other combinations of visits.

      This ticket may be partially or entirely superseded by DM-11372.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          blocks

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-12549 ap_pipe must call AssociationTask in a reproducible order

          • Done
          is duplicated by

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-13163 Refactor ap_pipe to use CmdLineTask primitives

          • Done
          relates to

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-12315 Generalize ap_pipe to non-HiTS data

          • Done

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-12535 Wrap ap_verify and run it over HITS dataset

          • Done

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-11372 Create CommandLineTask utility in `ap_pipe`

          • Won't Fix

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            ktl Kian-Tat Lim added a comment -

            Is the use case for this primarily in testing and validation, or is it also in environments like catch-up? If we had suitable workflow management that could execute ap_pipe repeatedly, would this still be necessary?

            Show
            ktl Kian-Tat Lim added a comment - Is the use case for this primarily in testing and validation, or is it also in environments like catch-up? If we had suitable workflow management that could execute ap_pipe repeatedly, would this still be necessary?
            Hide
            Permalink
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment -

            The current assumption is that ap_pipe may be executed by any user from the command line for any reason (though testing and validation are certainly the obvious applications). So I think you'd need the workflow management tools to be very user-friendly before they'd invalidate this ticket.

            Show
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment - The current assumption is that ap_pipe may be executed by any user from the command line for any reason (though testing and validation are certainly the obvious applications). So I think you'd need the workflow management tools to be very user-friendly before they'd invalidate this ticket.
            Hide
            Permalink
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment -

            Correction: the current code assumes a dataId is a specific CCD of a specific visit.

            Show
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment - Correction: the current code assumes a dataId is a specific CCD of a specific visit.
            Hide
            Permalink
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment -

            Obsolete after DM-13163.

            Show
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment - Obsolete after DM-13163 .

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              krzys Krzysztof Findeisen
              Watchers:
              Kian-Tat Lim, Krzysztof Findeisen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.