Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: jointcal
-
Labels:
-
Story Points:6
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:AP S18-6, AP F18-1, AP F18-2, AP F18-3, AP F18-4, AP F18-5
-
Team:Alert Production
Description
The astrometric fitter includes a pedestal on the measurement errors (AstrometryFit.cc::tweakAstromMeasurementErrors(), because it appeared the position error for bright sources was too small. We can compare (plot/statistics) the residuals vs. errors for the photometry, to see whether we will need a similar error pedestal there. This would be a good thing to put in the photometry notebook that uses the chi2 contributions files.
Adding this to the sprint: the PDR1 phtoometry continues to have nonlinear-like problems that might be fixed by a pedestal on the errors, so I need to look into this. Plus, Michael Wood-Vasey says that the validate_drp plots strongly imply a systematic error floor that is not being accounted for in the singleFrame results.