Fix Version/s: None
Component/s: Data Release Production
Sprint:DRP S18-5, DRP S18-6, DRP F18-1
Team:Data Release Production
I ran multiBandDriver.py on HSC-R 9813 3,4 to determine if any cModel configuration parameters can/should be changed to improve the running time and/or best-fit model parameters. My conclusions for the tested parameters are:
initial.nComponents (default 3): For 2, initial fits run in 0.67x the time, but the exp/dev fits run more slowly, so the total fit time is 0.94x. Initial fits are slightly worse on average (with large scatter) and a sizeable fraction of the dev/exp fits are significantly worse (deltalnP < -10).
For nComponents=6, the initial fitting time is more than twice as long, with modest increases in the exp/dev lnP (<1 for most galaxies, with scatter).
Recommendation: leave it at 3 or lower to 2.
initial.optimizer.gradientThreshold (default 1e-2): 1e-3 runs very slightly faster than default and very slightly improves fits. 1e-1 is slightly slower and also results in slightly worse initial/final fits.
Recommendation: lower to 1e-3.
initial.optimizer.maxInnerIterations (default 20): Zero impact on fits, running time for 8 is virtually identical; 50 is 1% slower.
Recommendation: leave at 20.
initial.optimizer.noSR1Term (default False): True radically changes fitting times by factors of (0.33, 4.37, 4.98)x for (initial, exp, dev) i.e. the initial fit is faster but the subsequent exp/dev are much slower.
Confusingly, the initial fits are better on average, whereas the final dev/exp are worse - this may warrant follow-up. Many of the very slow fits have faint PSF mags and may be pathological cases.
Recommendation: leave as False.
region.nFitRadiiMax (default 3): Surprisingly, nfitrad=2 initial fits are 0.5% slower than the default, whereas nfitrad=5 is 2% faster. However, the total fitting time scales by a factor of (0.86, 1.38) for the smaller/larger size.
Smaller fitting regions naturally have larger likelihoods, but I can't make a meaningful comparison between likelihoods - presumably the smaller region fits better in the common are and worse outside.
Recommendation: leave as is pending further investigation.
One common feature is that there is a non-negligible fraction of objects (usually with faint mag_psf) with very small differences in initial fit likelihood but large ones in the dev/exp fit, which should not occur frequently.
The quoted figures can be generated by the notebook created in