Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-1429

Improve Qserv Configuration Procedure

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: Won't Fix
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Qserv
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Based on input from review of DM-1338, and discussions at hangout https://confluence.lsstcorp.org/display/DM/LSST+Database+Hangout+2014-10-29: implement -keepdata option.

      • --keepdata will preserve qserv_meta.conf and my.cnf. Regarding the latter, this is necessary because user might have customized data_dir.
      • The structure of qserv_meta.conf and my.cnf must remain the same between existing version of Qserv and the to-be-configured version of Qserv. It is users's responsibility to ensure the structure did not change. Note in particular, the template files (with the exception of my.cnf) should not be customized

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jammes Fabrice Jammes added a comment -

            Feature implemented in DM-2595

            Show
            jammes Fabrice Jammes added a comment - Feature implemented in DM-2595
            Hide
            jbecla Jacek Becla added a comment -

            Yes! I just moved it to Dec (we can double check when planning Dec sprint if we really want it there)

            Show
            jbecla Jacek Becla added a comment - Yes! I just moved it to Dec (we can double check when planning Dec sprint if we really want it there)
            Hide
            jammes Fabrice Jammes added a comment -

            Hi Jacek Becla,

            In accordance to our short meeting this morning, shall we remove this ticket from current sprint? In my understanding DM-627 has a higher priority, isn't it?

            Cheers,

            Fabrice

            Show
            jammes Fabrice Jammes added a comment - Hi Jacek Becla , In accordance to our short meeting this morning, shall we remove this ticket from current sprint? In my understanding DM-627 has a higher priority, isn't it? Cheers, Fabrice

              People

              Assignee:
              jammes Fabrice Jammes
              Reporter:
              fritzm Fritz Mueller
              Watchers:
              Fabrice Jammes, Jacek Becla
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  CI Builds

                  No builds found.