Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:
-
Templates:customfield_11800 235063
-
Story Points:10
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:AP S19-1
-
Team:Alert Production
Description
This implements RFC-549. To my knowledge, PhotoCalib is currently the only part of the codebase that uses any unit for calibrated fluxes right now. Please comment here if you know of any other code.
Attachments
Issue Links
- contains
-
DM-16696 PhotoCalib produces negative flux errors for negative flux measurements.
- Done
- duplicates
-
DM-16696 PhotoCalib produces negative flux errors for negative flux measurements.
- Done
- is triggered by
-
RFC-549 Use nanojansky for calibrated fluxes in DM code and intermediate data products
- Implemented
- is triggering
-
DM-16830 Add versioning to PhotoCalib
- Done
- relates to
-
DM-17029 Update LoadReferenceObjectsTask to output fluxes in nanojansky
- Done
Thanks for your help with the review, Eli Rykoff! I posted in slack#dm-jointcal at the end of last week about the upcoming merge.
Here is the Community post summarizing these changes: https://community.lsst.org/t/photocalib-is-now-defined-in-terms-of-nanojansky/3508
Merged and done.