Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-17321

Provide mechanism for storing configuration for specific processing campaigns

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: To Do
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: obs_lsst, pex_config
    • Labels:
      None
    • Team:
      Architecture

      Description

      obs_lsst's config/ is a mixture of a few obs_lsst-specific things as well as many overrides which should not be needed for LSST if it is the default camera.

      We need to make sure that specific processing campaigns have someplace else to put configuration choices instead of the obs package. We don't have good infrastructure for that at the moment. So this is not a blocking issue for obs_lsst but we need to agree a proper approach.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            womullan Wil O'Mullane created issue -
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Summary fix config Provide mechanism for storing configuration for specific processing campaigns
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Component/s pex_config [ 10729 ]
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Description config/ is a mixture of a few obs_lsst specific things as well as many overrides which should not be needed for LSST if it is the default camera.

            We need to make sure that specific processing campaigns have someplace else to put configuration choices instead of the obs package. We don't have good infrastructure for that at the moment. So this is not a blocking issue for obs_lsst but we need to agree a proper approach.
            obs_lsst's {{config/}} is a mixture of a few obs_lsst-specific things as well as many overrides which should not be needed for LSST if it is the default camera.

            We need to make sure that specific processing campaigns have someplace else to put configuration choices instead of the obs package. We don't have good infrastructure for that at the moment. So this is not a blocking issue for obs_lsst but we need to agree a proper approach.
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Team Data Release Production [ 10301 ] Architecture [ 10304 ]
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Watchers Colin Slater, John Swinbank, Leanne Guy, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane [ Colin Slater, John Swinbank, Leanne Guy, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane ] Colin Slater, John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane [ Colin Slater, John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane ]
            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            Setting to team “Architecture”, who should take the lead on making sure we “agree a proper approach”.

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Setting to team “Architecture”, who should take the lead on making sure we “agree a proper approach”.
            swinbank John Swinbank made changes -
            Link This issue relates to RFC-569 [ RFC-569 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                womullan Wil O'Mullane
                Watchers:
                Colin Slater, John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:

                  Summary Panel