Unclear what the action item means. Based upon the text changes in LDM-148, assuming it meant adding availability requirements for enclaves. Reviewed text changes limited to that scope (i.e., not checking for non-availability SLA items or commenting on previously existing text). Individual comments appear in github.
High level comment: Some services fulfill multiple roles in with different availability requirements (i.e., depend upon components of other enclaves). So, the text tends to take side-trips to cover the multiple uses (and explain the availability differences). Not sure how to make this better. Maybe there are online and offline versions of a service and each should only appear in the appropriate enclave? Separate discussion of the (reusable) services from discussions of enclaves?