Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: To Do
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: squash
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:0.7
-
Epic Link:
-
Team:SQuaRE
Description
Simon Krughoff only members od any of the `lsst`, `lsst-dm` or `lsst-sqre` GitHub orgs can log in to SQuaSH and are granted an "editor" role.
Should we grant "viewer" role for people that are outside the project like LSSTDESC members?
I talked to Leanne about this, and she is fine with granting viewer status to science collaborations as long as it is clearly communicated that there will be variations in the metrics and that regressions in dailies should not be interpreted as failure of the code or process, but as indications of bugs that will be fixed.