Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Invalid
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ap_pipe
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:1
-
Epic Link:
-
Team:Alert Production
-
Urgent?:No
Description
The docs still have an old example of how to run ap_pipe
ap_pipe.py repo --calib repo/calibs --output path/to/put/processed/data/in -c associator.level1_db.db_name=ppdb/association.db --id visit=123456 ccdnum=42 filter=g --template path/to/templates
|
This needs to be updated to something closer to
ap_pipe.py repo --calib repo/calibs --output path/to/put/processed/data/in -c -c ppdb.db_url="sqlite:////absolute/path/to/database" -c ppdb.isolation_level="READ_UNCOMMITTED" --id visit=123456 ccdnum=42 filter=g
|
Attachments
Issue Links
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Labels | SciencePipelines |
| Epic Link |
|
| Team | Alert Production [ 10300 ] | |
| Urgent? | off |
I think I was referring to both the README and the "docs which are actually in the docs" as you say. I agree we shouldn't have duplication in the README, and certainly not over-a-year-out-of-date duplication, whoops.
The specificity of this ticket probably makes it invalid, though you could use it to essentially nuke the README (or perhaps have a friendly link to the nicely-rendered docs page). At any rate, the real docs should be correct per your and Krzysztof's latest updates to the new "diaPipe" config syntax in DM-23436.
Thanks! I'll mark this as duplicating both the above tickets (which isn't quite true, but near enough) and close it as invalid. And I've just edited README.md on DM-23436, so I think that we're good to go.
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | To Do [ 10001 ] | Invalid [ 11005 ] |
Do you happen to remember which docs this refers to?
I see a line something like the above in README.md (which I propose to simply remove, because it's duplicating the docs which are actually in the docs!) and in pipeline-tutorial.rst, which looks like it was modernized on
DM-16606.