This is great, thanks. Do we have the exact gains in dictionary format?

Yes! The code currently outputs gains and noise (and NL data) into a pkl file of the form "$OUTPUT_DIR/

calibrations/ptc/ptcData-*.pkl"  ptcData-auxTel_accs_2019SEP05.pkl 

From that, we can get: 

{'gain': {'C10': (1.1911067257724672, 0.01599755832884883),

  'C11': (1.1686513607714393, 0.008662566976834827),

  'C12': (1.1338901056007622, 0.0038876055626803382),

  'C13': (0.9990674295908423, 0.03861424488779851),

  'C14': (1.0485895357003965, 0.02453192284144153),

  'C15': (1.097963555389069, 0.01059692231097079),

  'C16': (1.1148116010306466, 0.005922303858265093),

  'C17': (1.1565999310259265, 0.01171219557373404),

  'C07': (1.2354120941987556, 0.01481293483426904),

  'C06': (1.2385477683157942, 0.0132526263347617),

  'C05': (1.2256337102102828, 0.012385661910652334),

  'C04': (1.201337331467337, 0.007603226008190262),

  'C03': (1.1991589980401929, 0.007500882711093573),

  'C02': (1.202712463837218, 0.012568588828134084),

  'C01': (1.208462965832034, 0.015197932521104657),

  'C00': (1.2095018951784517, 0.013636024676852425)},

'noise': {'C10': (18.815010876798656, 4.5208191964940845),

  'C11': (16.955041191567062, 3.007817213540805),

  'C12': (9.940714611172684, 2.394736134234343),

  'C13': (22.53673481054816, 10.787490890867176),

  'C14': (16.0836483669904, 9.852213584640712),

  'C15': (2.411140448454277, 27.81976325659762),

  'C16': (8.245661734655314, 4.325730244549337),

  'C17': (18.89908075407153, 3.5029059182182705),

  'C07': (19.573871395405178, 4.090700326393026),

  'C06': (21.287224014649894, 3.6737704185238136),

  'C05': (21.404222421957847, 3.620935624643844),

  'C04': (18.488528814950616, 2.5367124800058782),

  'C03': (17.352553108662466, 2.543603551077959),

  'C02': (18.491993169738482, 3.8541856433486363),

  'C01': (19.50526157283955, 4.256039805846565),

  'C00': (17.682873173523316, 3.845078430765022)} } 

Updated: Bias voltage (VBB) was of for dataset from 09/05/2019 (previous comment). A new data set was taken, with VBB= -50V (09/15/2019):  PTC_auxTel_ACCS_2019SEP15.pdf

Slightly smaller gains due to less curvature at the high flux end. 

{'gain': {'C10': (1.1143353888054162, 0.010790806113511606),

  'C11': (1.0744546074177885, 0.00077308781239113),

  'C12': (1.0885301740164992, 0.0006902327397118805),

  'C13': (1.089703493454284, 0.0020010075093248713),

  'C14': (1.081888949750466, 0.001872603331043035),

  'C15': (1.0789489121082785, 0.0026685476422665215),

  'C16': (1.0833228443624179, 0.002725282783754601),

  'C17': (1.0634827318445688, 0.002767693771596951),

  'C07': (1.1388561295242021, 0.006689679125010665),

  'C06': (1.124448381482941, 0.0020108050081614685),

  'C05': (1.113919870983015, 0.0011048677871096997),

  'C04': (1.1212999359248133, 0.002852389458886423),

  'C03': (1.1155481760543404, 0.0008904879741812307),

  'C02': (1.108154154093047, 0.0011902318887926577),

  'C01': (1.108331545692689, 0.002784571248999098),

  'C00': (1.1389994340482077, 0.009799276044876447)},

'noise': {'C10': (13.902234503068572, 4.22696333305991),

  'C11': (6.511079355040778, 0.5439573597735232),

  'C12': (7.806434267533971, 0.4243591874403514),

  'C13': (8.317161349939449, 1.1904823477992506),

  'C14': (8.643653081811149, 1.0941772902638927),

  'C15': (9.234330845585403, 1.4390449346988023),

  'C16': (9.765224290898596, 1.3331551756415527),

  'C17': (11.060718137571559, 1.1388687466822283),

  'C07': (13.67226022480397, 2.7306600645928283),

  'C06': (11.053706222368097, 0.8443491240064802),

  'C05': (11.05966044973938, 0.48872123357050207),

  'C04': (11.481004892170144, 1.2275424932404813),

  'C03': (9.317974550458095, 0.46569508163206785),

  'C02': (7.783025266545098, 0.7264769099367956),

  'C01': (8.165556790901919, 1.5343541729339452),

  'C00': (14.279359246229477, 3.68588036800095)},

Merlin Fisher-Levine Can this be marked as done? 

I think so, yes. But let's make a follow-on ticket to validate these if that's OK- could you file one, basically saying to use the gains from this ticket, and use it to correct a flatfield (or whatever we have that's closest to one in the configuration that this data was taken in) and check to see how good the continuity across amp bounaries is please? If you make me a watcher I'll comment/tweak etc if necessary.