Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-18638

Check for at least 2 visits in AMx metric calculation.

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: Done
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: validate_drp
    • Labels:
      None
    • Story Points:
      1
    • Epic Link:
    • Sprint:
      DRP S19-4
    • Team:
      Data Release Production

      Description

      Running `matchedVisitMetrics`for DM-17830 was yielding AM1 of 0 for HSC WIDE tracts 9615 and 9697 which have visits numbers in the single digits. AM1 is the median of the RMS of the distances between 2 stars in N visits. Closer inspection revealed that more than half of the RMSs were exactly zero, which is why the median was exactly zero.  Michael Wood-Vasey quickly found the problem which was that if a pair appeared in exactly one visit, the stdev([one distance]) was exactly 0  and not NaN.

      Require at least 2 distances before computing their stdev.

      Michael Wood-Vasey will investigate the potential bias is in the median RMS as a function of N.

      This change will increase our reported AMx reported in squash.

        Attachments

        1. download (13).png
          15 kB
          Yusra AlSayyad
        2. download (14).png
          14 kB
          Yusra AlSayyad

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Show
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad added a comment - BEFORE https://lsst-web.ncsa.illinois.edu/~yusra/RC_QA/w_2019_06-jointcal-stars-only-internal/validateDrp_bad/matchedVisitMetrics/9697/HSC-G/validate-jointcal_HSC-G_validate_drp.AM1_D_5_arcmin_17.0_21.5_mag.png AFTER https://lsst-web.ncsa.illinois.edu/~yusra/RC_QA/w_2019_06-jointcal-stars-only-internal/validateDrp/matchedVisitMetrics/9697/HSC-G/validate-jointcal_HSC-G_validate_drp.AM1_D_5_arcmin_17.0_21.5_mag.png
            Hide
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad added a comment -

            Do you want to review? I spent 5 minutes looking at what it'd take to build something that quacked like a matchedDataset to test the whole amx calculation, but it looked like it'd be an endeavor. I can file a ticket for that.
            Jenkins:
            https://ci.lsst.codes/blue/organizations/jenkins/stack-os-matrix/detail/stack-os-matrix/29563/

            Show
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad added a comment - Do you want to review? I spent 5 minutes looking at what it'd take to build something that quacked like a matchedDataset to test the whole amx calculation, but it looked like it'd be an endeavor. I can file a ticket for that. Jenkins: https://ci.lsst.codes/blue/organizations/jenkins/stack-os-matrix/detail/stack-os-matrix/29563/
            Hide
            Parejkoj John Parejko added a comment -

            It looks like only one line changed. It's probably worth a comment above that saying why 1 is the correct choice.

            Show
            Parejkoj John Parejko added a comment - It looks like only one line changed. It's probably worth a comment above that saying why 1 is the correct choice.
            Hide
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad added a comment -

            Added an inline comment and merged.

            Show
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad added a comment - Added an inline comment and merged.
            Hide
            wmwood-vasey Michael Wood-Vasey added a comment -

            Yes, this was my fault. I thought that numpy.std used 1/(n-1) and would return NaN for n=1. But I did not test this implicit assumption.

            I suggest we require 2 values and then return n/(n-1) * np.std(...) to correct the bias.

            I created DM-18751 to do this and will implement later today.

            Show
            wmwood-vasey Michael Wood-Vasey added a comment - Yes, this was my fault. I thought that numpy.std used 1/(n-1) and would return NaN for n=1. But I did not test this implicit assumption. I suggest we require 2 values and then return n/(n-1) * np.std(...) to correct the bias. I created DM-18751 to do this and will implement later today.

              People

              Assignee:
              yusra Yusra AlSayyad
              Reporter:
              yusra Yusra AlSayyad
              Reviewers:
              John Parejko
              Watchers:
              John Parejko, Michael Wood-Vasey, Simon Krughoff, Yusra AlSayyad
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.