Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-1946

HSC backport: low-level Footprint merge code

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: Done
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: afw
    • Labels:
      None
    • Story Points:
      4
    • Sprint:
      Science Pipelines DM-S15-2
    • Team:
      Data Release Production

      Description

      This is a transfer of changesets from the follow epics:

      Because this is purely an addition to the interface, and we're planning to redesign that interface in DM-1904, I don't think we need an RFC here.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment -

            Sounds good, but probably best not to put the new issue on the top of your stack - we should wait until the HSC side stops being a moving target with the new release, so we can be sure to include all the new commits on that issue.

            Show
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - Sounds good, but probably best not to put the new issue on the top of your stack - we should wait until the HSC side stops being a moving target with the new release, so we can be sure to include all the new commits on that issue.
            Hide
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment -

            Ah, ok. Does it make more sense for me to move onto DM-1945 next? It will be unblocked when this one gets merged, but I think it still requires an RFC (to be written by some very busy people...)

            Show
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment - Ah, ok. Does it make more sense for me to move onto DM-1945 next? It will be unblocked when this one gets merged, but I think it still requires an RFC (to be written by some very busy people...)
            Hide
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment -

            Yeah, I was thinking about that. I'll try to get the RFC out early next week. In the meantime, is working on DM-2194 feasible?

            Show
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - Yeah, I was thinking about that. I'll try to get the RFC out early next week. In the meantime, is working on DM-2194 feasible?
            Hide
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment -

            Hhhhmmm...Paul Price may have already addressed this in DM-1794, which I think has on the back burner. Perhaps the status just needs updating to "In Review"?

            Show
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment - Hhhhmmm... Paul Price may have already addressed this in DM-1794 , which I think has on the back burner. Perhaps the status just needs updating to "In Review"?
            Hide
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - - edited

            Hmm, if that doesn't work then do go ahead and get started on DM-1945. Even if the RFC does generate changes to what we did on the HSC side, we'll start by just transferring the HSC changes as-is, so I don't think it will be wasted effort.

            Show
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - - edited Hmm, if that doesn't work then do go ahead and get started on DM-1945 . Even if the RFC does generate changes to what we did on the HSC side, we'll start by just transferring the HSC changes as-is, so I don't think it will be wasted effort.

              People

              Assignee:
              lauren Lauren MacArthur
              Reporter:
              jbosch Jim Bosch
              Reviewers:
              Jim Bosch
              Watchers:
              Jim Bosch, John Swinbank, Lauren MacArthur
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: