Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-21217

Add option to select image to convolve based on seeing

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: To Do
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ip_diffim, pipe_tasks
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      ImageDifferenceTask currently supports the option to convolve either the template or the science image, but that option is frozen in the config. For long ap_pipe runs, there may be many visits with a range of seeing both better and worse than the template. While the order may not matter using ZOGY, we are seeing deconvolution artifacts with the current Alard&Lupton image subtraction when the order is incorrect.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          duplicates

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-21017 Consider changing the automated algorithmic path in ip_diffim to disable automated deconvolution

          • To Do
          is blocked by

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-21239 Bug fix: convolve science image in image differencing

          • Invalid
          relates to

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-21229 Investigate coadd/diffim platescale issues

          • Done

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-21702 Investigate the cause of the high number of false sources in convolveTemplate=False image differencing

          • Done

            Activity

            Hide
            Permalink
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment - - edited

            Two questions:

            • are you sure there isn't already an automatic selector? [resolved in group meeting]
            • do we have to worry about measurement error in the seeing? What happens if the science and template images have comparable seeing, so that there's a 50/50 chance that one or the other will be considered "better"?
            Show
            krzys Krzysztof Findeisen added a comment - - edited Two questions: are you sure there isn't already an automatic selector? [resolved in group meeting] do we have to worry about measurement error in the seeing? What happens if the science and template images have comparable seeing, so that there's a 50/50 chance that one or the other will be considered "better"?

              People

              Assignee:
              sullivan Ian Sullivan
              Reporter:
              sullivan Ian Sullivan
              Watchers:
              Ian Sullivan
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated: