Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: meas_base
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:1
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:Science Pipelines DM-W15-5, Science Pipelines DM-S15-1
-
Team:Data Release Production
Description
When building meas_base, or any other measurement plugins which follow the same interface, with clang, I see a bunch of warnings along the lines of:
In file included from src/ApertureFlux.cc:34:
|
include/lsst/meas/base/ApertureFlux.h:197:18: warning: 'lsst::meas::base::ApertureFluxAlgorithm::measure' hides overloaded virtual function
|
[-Woverloaded-virtual]
|
virtual void measure(
|
^
|
include/lsst/meas/base/Algorithm.h:183:18: note: hidden overloaded virtual function 'lsst::meas::base::SimpleAlgorithm::measure' declared here:
|
different number of parameters (4 vs 2)
|
virtual void measure(
|
This is an artefact of a workaround for SWIG issues; the warnings aren't indicative of a fundamental problem, but if we can avoid them we should.
While we're at it, we should also fix:
include/lsst/meas/base/ApertureFlux.h:233:1: warning: 'ApertureFluxResult' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class
|
[-Wmismatched-tags]
|
struct ApertureFluxResult : public FluxResult {
|
^
|
include/lsst/meas/base/ApertureFlux.h:65:1: note: did you mean struct here?
|
class ApertureFluxResult;
|
^~~~~
|
struct
|
Attachments
Issue Links
Activity
Jim – following our discussion, I tweaked meas_base to disambiguate measure and measureForced. Changes on tickets/DM-2131 in meas_base. Passes the tests there, and also resolves my issues in ip_diffim.
I realise you are snowed under with end-of-cycle reviews, but could you give it a quick check to make sure it's what you had in mind?
Also, since this is a change to the previously-agreed interface, any thoughts on whether it needs RFC-ing? My feeling is no.
Looks good; sorry it took me so long to take a look at this. I agree that this shouldn't require an RFC.
Thanks! ("So long" being two weekend days? Hmm...!)
I'd like to land this now, but it turns out I need to install GalSim before I can test on shapeHSM, and I doubt that's going to happen before I have to bump this to S15.
I am indeed happy with all of the above. Those particular warnings are now gone and all tests passed, so feel free to make and merge the other related changes when you can without further review.