Create 20.0.0 release candidate 1
Validate 20.0.0 release candidates
Do release 20.0.0 of science pipelines
A few comments
you say "14 photometric, astrometric and shape measurements were derived but only a subset were reported" - why only a subset? We should show all calculations and increasing progress towards completion.
There is a significant difference between the metric values obtained from the validation dataset and the RC2 dataset - sometimes better and sometimes worse. Do you understand the reasons? I assume running jointcal is what has resulted in better astrometric results? It would be good to include an explanation in the report.
Computational performance metrics were not re-measured for this release. We expect no significant changes relative to the report on version 12. ==> I don't think you can say the last sentence if you have not measured the computational performance since R12.
Abstract contains a '?' - some latex compile error?
After the DMTR-191 reference is fixed, the final step will be to fix the "acronyms" appendix. (For example, "KPM" doesn't appear, while "SSP: Solar System Processing" should not be there.)
The document is ready to be issued to Docushare.