Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ts_main_telescope
-
Story Points:2
-
Sprint:TSSW Sprint - Jun 8 - Jun 22
-
Team:Telescope and Site
-
Urgent?:No
Description
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we do see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at DM-25243):
The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds).
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
DM-25045 Review the Control Algorithm of Rotator in Phase 2
- Done
-
DM-25243 Fix the Bugs of Trajectory If No Track Command Received In the Tracking
- Done
-
DM-25441 Remove the History of Trajectory after the Stop Command in the Tracking
- Done
-
DM-36861 The MT rotator is going in the wrong direction when tracking ramps
- Done
-
DM-36872 MT rotator TRACK enabled substate command reports done before the rotator is ready to receive TRACK_VEL_CMD commands
- Done
Activity
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Epic Link |
|
Description | If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result: |
Attachment | track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png [ 44217 ] |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result: |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result: !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result: !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at DM-25434): !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at DM-25434): !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at [ !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at [ !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink mode by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how is that decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds. |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command at time equals 6 seconds). |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command at time equals 6 seconds). |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we did see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we does see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we does see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we do see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
Description |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This time could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we do see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
If the rotator does not receive the track command for a long time, the rotator should be put into the Fault state. This could be 0.5 second (by Tiago) or 1 second (by Russell). At this moment, we do see this in the Simulink model by the simulation experiment, but we do not know how that is decided. In addition, we did not see this when we did the test on summit. This task needs to figure out what is the existed logic in model and how to update it.
The following is the figure to show the simulation result (detail is at !track_v0_1_long_enterFault.png|thumbnail! The system is at the Fault state around time equals 20.2 seconds (no new track command after time=6 seconds). |
Labels | HexRot MainTelescope | HexRot MainTelescope ccw-rotator-integration-test |
Status | To Do [ 10001 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Attachment | slewWithoutNewTrackCmd.png [ 44428 ] |
Attachment | trackWithNoNewTrackCmdAfterSomeTime.png [ 44439 ] |
Attachment | trackAndEnterFaultAfterSlewDoneWithoutNewTrackCmd.png [ 44456 ] |
Attachment | trackAndEnterFaultAtTrackStateWithoutNewTrackCmd.png [ 44459 ] |
Attachment | trackAndFaultAndClearError.png [ 44461 ] |
Attachment | trackAndFaultAndClearErrorFinalTrack9_5secMagnify.png [ 44462 ] | |
Attachment | trackAndFaultAndClearErrorFinalTrack9_5sec.png [ 44463 ] |
Story Points | 3 | 2 |
Reviewers | Russell Owen [ rowen ] | |
Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | In Review [ 10004 ] |
Status | In Review [ 10004 ] | Reviewed [ 10101 ] |
Attachment | image-2020-06-22-10-58-59-157.png [ 44498 ] |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Reviewed [ 10101 ] | Done [ 10002 ] |