On Slack:

Chris Waters 12:03
The only thing that should be missing from crosstalk as of today is a functional form for measuring non-linear CT. The data is available (in gen3 processing) to do flux dependent CT, but there's no implementation defined.

rhl 12:03
For measuring the coefficients, or for applying them?

Chris Waters 12:04
Both. I didn't want to just add another arbitrary polynomial without looking more at the nonlinear crosstalk claims/data.

rhl 12:09
Sounds like the right call. Assuming linearity, have we processed the spot data and derived x-talk coeffs to compare to Adam's?

Chris Waters 12:13
I don't believe so. The updated crosstalk code has only been available for the past month. If the spot data has been ingested, it should be possible to compare

rhl 12:14
I think that should be @Andrés Plazas’s first experiment when we get back to looking at crosstalk. It should all be ingested, in gen2