[DM-28459] Bands seem wrong for LATISS in butler - Jira

XML

Word

Printable

Details

Type: Story
Status: Done
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: None
Component/s: obs_lsst
Labels:
None

Story Points:
3
Team:
Architecture
Urgent?:
No

Description

I just glanced at the physical_filter / band mappings in gen3 butler and I get the following:

instrument              name                          band

---------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------

    LATISS                          BG40                          BG40

    LATISS                    BG40~empty                    BG40~empty

    LATISS                     BG40~none                     BG40~none

    LATISS            BG40~ronchi170lpmm            BG40~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS             BG40~ronchi90lpmm             BG40~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS                  BG40~unknown                  BG40~unknown

    LATISS               KPNO_1111_436nm                             g

    LATISS         KPNO_1111_436nm~empty         KPNO_1111_436nm~empty

    LATISS          KPNO_1111_436nm~none          KPNO_1111_436nm~none

    LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS  KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm  KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS       KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown       KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown

    LATISS               KPNO_373A_677nm                             r

    LATISS         KPNO_373A_677nm~empty         KPNO_373A_677nm~empty

    LATISS          KPNO_373A_677nm~none          KPNO_373A_677nm~none

    LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS  KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm  KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS       KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown       KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown

    LATISS                KPNO_406_828nm                             z

    LATISS          KPNO_406_828nm~empty          KPNO_406_828nm~empty

    LATISS           KPNO_406_828nm~none           KPNO_406_828nm~none

    LATISS  KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm  KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS   KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm   KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS        KPNO_406_828nm~unknown        KPNO_406_828nm~unknown

    LATISS                         RG610                         RG610

    LATISS                   RG610~empty                   RG610~empty

    LATISS                    RG610~none                    RG610~none

    LATISS           RG610~ronchi170lpmm           RG610~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS            RG610~ronchi90lpmm            RG610~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS                 RG610~unknown                 RG610~unknown

    LATISS                blank_bk7_wg05                blank_bk7_wg05

    LATISS          blank_bk7_wg05~empty          blank_bk7_wg05~empty

    LATISS           blank_bk7_wg05~none           blank_bk7_wg05~none

    LATISS  blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm  blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS   blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm   blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS        blank_bk7_wg05~unknown        blank_bk7_wg05~unknown

    LATISS                      diffuser                      diffuser

    LATISS                diffuser~empty                diffuser~empty

    LATISS                 diffuser~none                 diffuser~none

    LATISS        diffuser~ronchi170lpmm        diffuser~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS         diffuser~ronchi90lpmm         diffuser~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS              diffuser~unknown              diffuser~unknown

    LATISS                         empty                         empty

    LATISS                   empty~empty                   empty~empty

    LATISS                    empty~none                    empty~none

    LATISS           empty~ronchi170lpmm           empty~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS            empty~ronchi90lpmm            empty~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS                 empty~unknown                 empty~unknown

    LATISS                    quadnotch1                    quadnotch1

    LATISS              quadnotch1~empty              quadnotch1~empty

    LATISS               quadnotch1~none               quadnotch1~none

    LATISS      quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm      quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS       quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm       quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS            quadnotch1~unknown            quadnotch1~unknown

    LATISS                       unknown                       unknown

    LATISS                 unknown~empty                 unknown~empty

    LATISS                  unknown~none                  unknown~none

    LATISS         unknown~ronchi170lpmm         unknown~ronchi170lpmm

    LATISS          unknown~ronchi90lpmm          unknown~ronchi90lpmm

    LATISS               unknown~unknown               unknown~unknown

This seems very very wrong to me. We have KPNO_406_828nm as z but we also have KPNO_406_828nm~empty being something completely different when surely that is also meant to be "z" ? And at the very least for "KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm" shouldn't the band be "z~something" or just "z" since presumably it is still z-band. The physical filter name should never turn up in the band.

Attachments

Issue Links

is triggered by

RFC-737 Name the band `white` when no filter is in the beam.

Implemented

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 26/Jan/21 11:02 PM

Should I simply replace every a~b physical filter with the band corresponding to a ? Does that work for everyone?

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 26/Jan/21 11:02 PM Should I simply replace every a~b physical filter with the band corresponding to a ? Does that work for everyone?

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 08/Feb/21 8:32 PM

Also, it doesn't seem like we want to define physical filters of "unknown,unknown~empty,unknown~none,unknown~unknown" since I think we can safely call that filter "unknown". Similarly we have "empty, empty~empty, empty~none" which should all be "empty". We seem to be doubling up with empty+none but they should all be empty.

If someone can tell me what they want the band to be for "KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm" (for example) then I can fix all this.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 08/Feb/21 8:32 PM Also, it doesn't seem like we want to define physical filters of "unknown,unknown~empty,unknown~none,unknown~unknown" since I think we can safely call that filter "unknown". Similarly we have "empty, empty~empty, empty~none" which should all be "empty". We seem to be doubling up with empty+none but they should all be empty. If someone can tell me what they want the band to be for "KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm" (for example) then I can fix all this.

Hide

Permalink

Robert Lupton added a comment - 08/Feb/21 8:53 PM

Cleaning up the empty~empty etc. bands as proposed seems fine – thank you.

For the KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm ones I don't think it's worth coming up with more concise names; its a blocking filter with a 90 lines/mm grating, but I don't think we'd ever merge it with any other grating (even a holographic grating with the same effective number of lines/mm)

Show

Robert Lupton added a comment - 08/Feb/21 8:53 PM Cleaning up the empty~empty etc. bands as proposed seems fine – thank you. For the KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm ones I don't think it's worth coming up with more concise names; its a blocking filter with a 90 lines/mm grating, but I don't think we'd ever merge it with any other grating (even a holographic grating with the same effective number of lines/mm)

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 08/Feb/21 9:08 PM

My bigger complaint is that the band should not have the filter name in it at all.

The next issue is whether the grating should be in the band name. A very specific grating in there seems wrong. So is the band "z" or "z~90lpmm"?

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 08/Feb/21 9:08 PM My bigger complaint is that the band should not have the filter name in it at all. The next issue is whether the grating should be in the band name. A very specific grating in there seems wrong. So is the band "z" or "z~90lpmm"?

Hide

Permalink

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 08/Feb/21 10:07 PM

Personally, I think I'd vote for ignoring all dispersive elements when defining the band, so just pick a nice name for each filter we have at the moment, define its band name, and just chuck the disperser (specifically because it is likely useful to be able to regard more/less dispersed images with the same bandpass as one "band").

Show

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 08/Feb/21 10:07 PM Personally, I think I'd vote for ignoring all dispersive elements when defining the band, so just pick a nice name for each filter we have at the moment, define its band name, and just chuck the disperser (specifically because it is likely useful to be able to regard more/less dispersed images with the same bandpass as one "band").

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:30 PM

I've pushed a patch to this branch that cleans up LATISS to look something like:

    LATISS                          BG40               g

    LATISS                    BG40~empty               g

    LATISS            BG40~ronchi170lpmm               g

    LATISS             BG40~ronchi90lpmm               g

    LATISS                  BG40~unknown               g

    LATISS               KPNO_1111_436nm               g

    LATISS         KPNO_1111_436nm~empty               g

    LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm               g

    LATISS  KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm               g

    LATISS       KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown               g

    LATISS               KPNO_373A_677nm               r

    LATISS         KPNO_373A_677nm~empty               r

    LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm               r

    LATISS  KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm               r

    LATISS       KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown               r

    LATISS                KPNO_406_828nm               z

    LATISS          KPNO_406_828nm~empty               z

    LATISS  KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm               z

    LATISS   KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm               z

    LATISS        KPNO_406_828nm~unknown               z

    LATISS                         RG610               r

    LATISS                   RG610~empty               r

    LATISS           RG610~ronchi170lpmm               r

    LATISS            RG610~ronchi90lpmm               r

    LATISS                 RG610~unknown               r

    LATISS                blank_bk7_wg05          opaque

    LATISS          blank_bk7_wg05~empty          opaque

    LATISS  blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm          opaque

    LATISS   blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm          opaque

    LATISS        blank_bk7_wg05~unknown          opaque

    LATISS                      diffuser        diffuser

    LATISS                diffuser~empty        diffuser

    LATISS        diffuser~ronchi170lpmm        diffuser

    LATISS         diffuser~ronchi90lpmm        diffuser

    LATISS              diffuser~unknown        diffuser

    LATISS                         empty           white

    LATISS                   empty~empty           white

    LATISS           empty~ronchi170lpmm           white

    LATISS            empty~ronchi90lpmm           white

    LATISS                 empty~unknown           white

    LATISS                    quadnotch1           notch

    LATISS              quadnotch1~empty           notch

    LATISS      quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm           notch

    LATISS       quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm           notch

    LATISS            quadnotch1~unknown           notch

    LATISS                       unknown         unknown

    LATISS                 unknown~empty         unknown

    LATISS         unknown~ronchi170lpmm         unknown

    LATISS          unknown~ronchi90lpmm         unknown

    LATISS               unknown~unknown         unknown

I now see that there are problems with the ND filters in BOT. We have the same problem of the band being things like "480nm~ND_OD0_5" when surely this band is simply "g"?

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:30 PM I've pushed a patch to this branch that cleans up LATISS to look something like: LATISS BG40 g LATISS BG40~empty g LATISS BG40~ronchi170lpmm g LATISS BG40~ronchi90lpmm g LATISS BG40~unknown g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~empty g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown g LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~empty r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown r LATISS KPNO_406_828nm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~empty z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~unknown z LATISS RG610 r LATISS RG610~empty r LATISS RG610~ronchi170lpmm r LATISS RG610~ronchi90lpmm r LATISS RG610~unknown r LATISS blank_bk7_wg05 opaque LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~empty opaque LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm opaque LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm opaque LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~unknown opaque LATISS diffuser diffuser LATISS diffuser~empty diffuser LATISS diffuser~ronchi170lpmm diffuser LATISS diffuser~ronchi90lpmm diffuser LATISS diffuser~unknown diffuser LATISS empty white LATISS empty~empty white LATISS empty~ronchi170lpmm white LATISS empty~ronchi90lpmm white LATISS empty~unknown white LATISS quadnotch1 notch LATISS quadnotch1~empty notch LATISS quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm notch LATISS quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm notch LATISS quadnotch1~unknown notch LATISS unknown unknown LATISS unknown~empty unknown LATISS unknown~ronchi170lpmm unknown LATISS unknown~ronchi90lpmm unknown LATISS unknown~unknown unknown I now see that there are problems with the ND filters in BOT. We have the same problem of the band being things like "480nm~ND_OD0_5" when surely this band is simply "g"?

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:32 PM

Also, do we care about the "empty5" etc or should those all be physical_filter=empty and the metadata translator should map all emptyN to empty? We do that mapping for LATISS so this empty5 in BOT seems like a bug. The problem I think is that the code looks for empty_N which is what we use for LATISS but BOT uses emptyN so that doesn't match. I think I should fix that in the translator and remove the emptyN physical filters.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:32 PM Also, do we care about the "empty5" etc or should those all be physical_filter=empty and the metadata translator should map all emptyN to empty? We do that mapping for LATISS so this empty5 in BOT seems like a bug. The problem I think is that the code looks for empty_N which is what we use for LATISS but BOT uses emptyN so that doesn't match. I think I should fix that in the translator and remove the emptyN physical filters.

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:41 PM

Ah. The code already maps empty5 to empty so the emptyN entries need to be removed completely.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:41 PM Ah. The code already maps empty5 to empty so the emptyN entries need to be removed completely.

Hide

Permalink

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:49 PM

I agree with all that. The only worry I have is whether BG40 and KPNO_1111_436nm have sufficiently similar banndpasses to both be mapped to g or not.

Also, blank and empty are supposed to be synonyms for LATISS, i.e. mapping blank* to opaque is not correct, that should be mapped to white instead.

Finally, I have no idea what diffuser is or is coming from!

Show

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 09/Feb/21 5:49 PM I agree with all that. The only worry I have is whether BG40 and KPNO_1111_436nm have sufficiently similar banndpasses to both be mapped to g or not. Also, blank and empty are supposed to be synonyms for LATISS, i.e. mapping blank* to opaque is not correct, that should be mapped to white instead. Finally, I have no idea what diffuser is or is coming from!

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 6:21 PM

blank should not exist if it's a synonym for empty. We already have empty and the metadata translator should be treating blank as empty if that's the case. Having two words for empty seems confusing.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 6:21 PM blank should not exist if it's a synonym for empty. We already have empty and the metadata translator should be treating blank as empty if that's the case. Having two words for empty seems confusing.

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 6:22 PM

I think diffuser is a piece of fabric or something that Patrick Ingraham put in front of the window during very early testing.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 6:22 PM I think diffuser is a piece of fabric or something that Patrick Ingraham put in front of the window during very early testing.

Hide

Permalink

Patrick Ingraham added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:26 PM

Correct, the diffuser was for lab testing. Essentially ancient history.

Show

Patrick Ingraham added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:26 PM Correct, the diffuser was for lab testing. Essentially ancient history.

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:41 PM

Merlin Fisher-Levine I've updated the band calculation and cleaned it up a bit to now assume that bands do not have to be unique.

The current LSSTCam result is now:

   LSSTCam                         480nm        g

   LSSTCam               480nm~ND_OD0.01     g~nd

   LSSTCam               480nm~ND_OD0.05     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD0.1     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD0.3     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD0.4     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD0.5     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD0.7     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD1.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD2.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD3.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                480nm~ND_OD4.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                         650nm        r

   LSSTCam               650nm~ND_OD0.01     r~nd

   LSSTCam               650nm~ND_OD0.05     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD0.1     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD0.3     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD0.4     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD0.5     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD0.7     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD1.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD2.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD3.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                650nm~ND_OD4.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                         750nm        i

   LSSTCam               750nm~ND_OD0.01     i~nd

   LSSTCam               750nm~ND_OD0.05     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD0.1     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD0.3     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD0.4     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD0.5     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD0.7     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD1.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD2.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD3.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                750nm~ND_OD4.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                         870nm        z

   LSSTCam               870nm~ND_OD0.01     z~nd

   LSSTCam               870nm~ND_OD0.05     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD0.1     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD0.3     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD0.4     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD0.5     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD0.7     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD1.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD2.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD3.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                870nm~ND_OD4.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                         950nm        y

   LSSTCam               950nm~ND_OD0.01     y~nd

   LSSTCam               950nm~ND_OD0.05     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD0.1     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD0.3     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD0.4     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD0.5     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD0.7     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD1.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD2.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD3.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                950nm~ND_OD4.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                         970nm        y

   LSSTCam               970nm~ND_OD0.01     y~nd

   LSSTCam               970nm~ND_OD0.05     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD0.1     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD0.3     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD0.4     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD0.5     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD0.7     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD1.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD2.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD3.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                970nm~ND_OD4.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                     ND_OD0.01 white~nd

   LSSTCam                     ND_OD0.05 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD0.1 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD0.3 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD0.4 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD0.5 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD0.7 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD1.0 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD2.0 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD3.0 white~nd

   LSSTCam                      ND_OD4.0 white~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSY        y

   LSSTCam               SDSSY~ND_OD0.01     y~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSY~ND_OD0.05     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD0.1     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD0.3     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD0.4     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD0.5     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD0.7     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD1.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD2.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD3.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSY~ND_OD4.0     y~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSg        g

   LSSTCam               SDSSg~ND_OD0.01     g~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSg~ND_OD0.05     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD0.1     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD0.3     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD0.4     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD0.5     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD0.7     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD1.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD2.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD3.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSg~ND_OD4.0     g~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSi        i

   LSSTCam               SDSSi~ND_OD0.01     i~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSi~ND_OD0.05     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD0.1     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD0.3     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD0.4     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD0.5     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD0.7     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD1.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD2.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD3.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSi~ND_OD4.0     i~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSr        r

   LSSTCam               SDSSr~ND_OD0.01     r~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSr~ND_OD0.05     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD0.1     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD0.3     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD0.4     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD0.5     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD0.7     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD1.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD2.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD3.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSr~ND_OD4.0     r~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSu        u

   LSSTCam               SDSSu~ND_OD0.01     u~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSu~ND_OD0.05     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD0.1     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD0.3     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD0.4     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD0.5     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD0.7     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD1.0     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD2.0     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD3.0     u~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSu~ND_OD4.0     u~nd

   LSSTCam                         SDSSz        z

   LSSTCam               SDSSz~ND_OD0.01     z~nd

   LSSTCam               SDSSz~ND_OD0.05     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD0.1     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD0.3     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD0.4     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD0.5     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD0.7     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD1.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD2.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD3.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                SDSSz~ND_OD4.0     z~nd

   LSSTCam                         empty    white

   LSSTCam                             g        g

   LSSTCam                          grid     grid

   LSSTCam                grid~ND_OD0.01  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                grid~ND_OD0.05  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD0.1  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD0.3  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD0.4  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD0.5  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD0.7  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD1.0  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD2.0  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD3.0  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                 grid~ND_OD4.0  grid~nd

   LSSTCam                             i        i

   LSSTCam                             r        r

   LSSTCam                          spot     spot

   LSSTCam                spot~ND_OD0.01  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                spot~ND_OD0.05  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD0.1  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD0.3  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD0.4  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD0.5  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD0.7  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD1.0  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD2.0  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD3.0  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                 spot~ND_OD4.0  spot~nd

   LSSTCam                             u        u

   LSSTCam                       unknown  unknown

   LSSTCam                             y        y

   LSSTCam                             z        z

I fixed the blank->white issue as well.

This change required that I make a small change to obs_base to make it handle afwFilter duplication a bit better. That is for deprecated code so I hope it's not contentious.

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:41 PM Merlin Fisher-Levine I've updated the band calculation and cleaned it up a bit to now assume that bands do not have to be unique. The current LSSTCam result is now: LSSTCam 480nm g LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.01 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.05 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.1 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.3 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.4 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.5 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD0.7 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD1.0 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD2.0 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD3.0 g~nd LSSTCam 480nm~ND_OD4.0 g~nd LSSTCam 650nm r LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.01 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.05 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.1 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.3 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.4 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.5 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD0.7 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD1.0 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD2.0 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD3.0 r~nd LSSTCam 650nm~ND_OD4.0 r~nd LSSTCam 750nm i LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.01 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.05 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.1 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.3 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.4 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.5 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD0.7 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD1.0 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD2.0 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD3.0 i~nd LSSTCam 750nm~ND_OD4.0 i~nd LSSTCam 870nm z LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.01 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.05 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.1 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.3 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.4 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.5 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD0.7 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD1.0 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD2.0 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD3.0 z~nd LSSTCam 870nm~ND_OD4.0 z~nd LSSTCam 950nm y LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.01 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.05 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.1 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.3 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.4 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.5 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD0.7 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD1.0 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD2.0 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD3.0 y~nd LSSTCam 950nm~ND_OD4.0 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm y LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.01 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.05 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.1 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.3 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.4 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.5 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD0.7 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD1.0 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD2.0 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD3.0 y~nd LSSTCam 970nm~ND_OD4.0 y~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.01 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.05 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.1 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.3 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.4 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.5 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD0.7 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD1.0 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD2.0 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD3.0 white~nd LSSTCam ND_OD4.0 white~nd LSSTCam SDSSY y LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.01 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.05 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.1 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.3 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.4 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.5 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD0.7 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD1.0 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD2.0 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD3.0 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSY~ND_OD4.0 y~nd LSSTCam SDSSg g LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.01 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.05 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.1 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.3 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.4 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.5 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD0.7 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD1.0 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD2.0 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD3.0 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSg~ND_OD4.0 g~nd LSSTCam SDSSi i LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.01 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.05 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.1 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.3 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.4 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.5 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD0.7 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD1.0 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD2.0 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD3.0 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSi~ND_OD4.0 i~nd LSSTCam SDSSr r LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.01 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.05 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.1 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.3 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.4 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.5 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD0.7 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD1.0 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD2.0 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD3.0 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSr~ND_OD4.0 r~nd LSSTCam SDSSu u LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.01 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.05 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.1 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.3 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.4 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.5 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD0.7 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD1.0 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD2.0 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD3.0 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSu~ND_OD4.0 u~nd LSSTCam SDSSz z LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.01 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.05 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.1 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.3 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.4 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.5 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD0.7 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD1.0 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD2.0 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD3.0 z~nd LSSTCam SDSSz~ND_OD4.0 z~nd LSSTCam empty white LSSTCam g g LSSTCam grid grid LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.01 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.05 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.1 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.3 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.4 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.5 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD0.7 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD1.0 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD2.0 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD3.0 grid~nd LSSTCam grid~ND_OD4.0 grid~nd LSSTCam i i LSSTCam r r LSSTCam spot spot LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.01 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.05 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.1 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.3 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.4 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.5 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD0.7 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD1.0 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD2.0 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD3.0 spot~nd LSSTCam spot~ND_OD4.0 spot~nd LSSTCam u u LSSTCam unknown unknown LSSTCam y y LSSTCam z z I fixed the blank->white issue as well. This change required that I make a small change to obs_base to make it handle afwFilter duplication a bit better. That is for deprecated code so I hope it's not contentious.

Hide

Permalink

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:57 PM

Patrick Ingraham thanks. I've change LATISS to not attach a grating to diffuser. The list is now:

instrument              name               band

---------- ----------------------------- --------

    LATISS                          BG40        g

    LATISS                    BG40~empty        g

    LATISS            BG40~ronchi170lpmm        g

    LATISS             BG40~ronchi90lpmm        g

    LATISS                  BG40~unknown        g

    LATISS               KPNO_1111_436nm        g

    LATISS         KPNO_1111_436nm~empty        g

    LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm        g

    LATISS  KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm        g

    LATISS       KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown        g

    LATISS               KPNO_373A_677nm        r

    LATISS         KPNO_373A_677nm~empty        r

    LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm        r

    LATISS  KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm        r

    LATISS       KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown        r

    LATISS                KPNO_406_828nm        z

    LATISS          KPNO_406_828nm~empty        z

    LATISS  KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm        z

    LATISS   KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm        z

    LATISS        KPNO_406_828nm~unknown        z

    LATISS                         RG610        r

    LATISS                   RG610~empty        r

    LATISS           RG610~ronchi170lpmm        r

    LATISS            RG610~ronchi90lpmm        r

    LATISS                 RG610~unknown        r

    LATISS                blank_bk7_wg05    white

    LATISS          blank_bk7_wg05~empty    white

    LATISS  blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm    white

    LATISS   blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm    white

    LATISS        blank_bk7_wg05~unknown    white

    LATISS                      diffuser diffuser

    LATISS                         empty    white

    LATISS                   empty~empty    white

    LATISS           empty~ronchi170lpmm    white

    LATISS            empty~ronchi90lpmm    white

    LATISS                 empty~unknown    white

    LATISS                    quadnotch1    notch

    LATISS              quadnotch1~empty    notch

    LATISS      quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm    notch

    LATISS       quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm    notch

    LATISS            quadnotch1~unknown    notch

    LATISS                       unknown  unknown

    LATISS                 unknown~empty  unknown

    LATISS         unknown~ronchi170lpmm  unknown

    LATISS          unknown~ronchi90lpmm  unknown

    LATISS               unknown~unknown  unknown

Show

Tim Jenness added a comment - 09/Feb/21 10:57 PM Patrick Ingraham thanks. I've change LATISS to not attach a grating to diffuser. The list is now: instrument name band ---------- ----------------------------- -------- LATISS BG40 g LATISS BG40~empty g LATISS BG40~ronchi170lpmm g LATISS BG40~ronchi90lpmm g LATISS BG40~unknown g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~empty g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi170lpmm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~ronchi90lpmm g LATISS KPNO_1111_436nm~unknown g LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~empty r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi170lpmm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~ronchi90lpmm r LATISS KPNO_373A_677nm~unknown r LATISS KPNO_406_828nm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~empty z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi170lpmm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~ronchi90lpmm z LATISS KPNO_406_828nm~unknown z LATISS RG610 r LATISS RG610~empty r LATISS RG610~ronchi170lpmm r LATISS RG610~ronchi90lpmm r LATISS RG610~unknown r LATISS blank_bk7_wg05 white LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~empty white LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi170lpmm white LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~ronchi90lpmm white LATISS blank_bk7_wg05~unknown white LATISS diffuser diffuser LATISS empty white LATISS empty~empty white LATISS empty~ronchi170lpmm white LATISS empty~ronchi90lpmm white LATISS empty~unknown white LATISS quadnotch1 notch LATISS quadnotch1~empty notch LATISS quadnotch1~ronchi170lpmm notch LATISS quadnotch1~ronchi90lpmm notch LATISS quadnotch1~unknown notch LATISS unknown unknown LATISS unknown~empty unknown LATISS unknown~ronchi170lpmm unknown LATISS unknown~ronchi90lpmm unknown LATISS unknown~unknown unknown

Hide

Permalink

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 09/Feb/21 11:51 PM

Those results all look great, I think - I'll get to the code review now.

Show

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 09/Feb/21 11:51 PM Those results all look great, I think - I'll get to the code review now.

Hide

Permalink

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 10/Feb/21 12:40 AM

All looks great.

Show

Merlin Fisher-Levine added a comment - 10/Feb/21 12:40 AM All looks great.

People

Assignee:: Tim Jenness

Reporter:: Tim Jenness

Reviewers:: Merlin Fisher-Levine

Watchers:: Merlin Fisher-Levine, Patrick Ingraham, Robert Lupton, Tim Jenness

Votes:: 0 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 4 Start watching this issue

Dates

Created:: 22/Jan/21 4:23 PM

Updated:: 10/Feb/21 8:20 PM

Resolved:: 10/Feb/21 8:20 PM

Jenkins

No builds found.

Data Management

Details

Description

Attachments

Issue Links

Activity

People

Dates

Jenkins