Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-30817

Compare the gen2 vs. gen3 visit-level post-processing data products

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Story Points:
      1
    • Epic Link:
    • Team:
      Data Release Production
    • Urgent?:
      No

      Description

      As per the discussion on DM-30647, the detailed outputs from the postprocess step which creates various summary/aggregated/DPDD-ified tables (most of which are persisted as parquet).  This includes at least the sourceTable and sourceTable_visit datasets, but there may be a few more to check in the next processing run (e.g. I think CcdVisitTable and visitTable have been recently added, but it may be that we only ever produce these with gen3).

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            No builds found.
            lauren Lauren MacArthur created issue -
            lauren Lauren MacArthur made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue relates to DM-30647 [ DM-30647 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30472 [ 509197 ] DM-30540 [ 511198 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30540 [ 511198 ] DM-30547 [ 511213 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30547 [ 511213 ] DM-30555 [ 511221 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30555 [ 511221 ] DM-32157 [ 779840 ]
            Hide
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            Is this relevant any more?

            Show
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - Is this relevant any more?
            Hide
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment -

            As per my comment in section 2. of https://confluence.lsstcorp.org/display/DM/Gen2+Middleware+Removal+Planning:

            Oh, one final note: I have only done some spot-checking comparing the rolled up and DPDD-ified parquet tables in detail.  The per-detector/per-patch non DPDD versions are already effectively tested since those are used in the plotting scripts.  So far, the only differences I've found are a few different column entries;

            objectTables: the Gen3 has one column entry that the Gen2 does not: {'skymap'}

            sourceTables: Gen3 has {'band', 'instrument', 'physical_filter', 'visit_system'}

                                      Gen2 has {'detectorName', 'expId', 'raftName', 'run'}

            this check was not done in an exhaustive fashion, but I was convinced by my spot checking that this was not necessary. Just to be sure, I’m putting this in review to Jim Bosch to give him a chance to request a more extensive comparison (assuming the latest gen2 runs actually got transferred to the new USDF at SLAC )

            Show
            lauren Lauren MacArthur added a comment - As per my comment in section 2. of https://confluence.lsstcorp.org/display/DM/Gen2+Middleware+Removal+Planning : Oh, one final note: I have only done some spot-checking comparing the rolled up and DPDD-ified parquet tables in detail.  The per-detector/per-patch non DPDD versions are already effectively tested since those are used in the plotting scripts.  So far, the only differences I've found are a few different column entries; objectTables: the Gen3 has one column entry that the Gen2 does not: {'skymap'} sourceTables: Gen3 has {'band', 'instrument', 'physical_filter', 'visit_system'}                           Gen2 has {'detectorName', 'expId', 'raftName', 'run'} this check was not done in an exhaustive fashion, but I was convinced by my spot checking that this was not necessary. Just to be sure, I’m putting this in review to Jim Bosch to give him a chance to request a more extensive comparison (assuming the latest gen2 runs actually got transferred to the new USDF at SLAC )
            lauren Lauren MacArthur made changes -
            Status To Do [ 10001 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            lauren Lauren MacArthur made changes -
            Reviewers Jim Bosch [ jbosch ]
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] In Review [ 10004 ]
            Hide
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment -

            No need for more work on this whatsoever.

            Show
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - No need for more work on this whatsoever.
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Status In Review [ 10004 ] Reviewed [ 10101 ]
            lauren Lauren MacArthur made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Reviewed [ 10101 ] Done [ 10002 ]
            lauren Lauren MacArthur made changes -
            Story Points 1

              People

              Assignee:
              lauren Lauren MacArthur
              Reporter:
              lauren Lauren MacArthur
              Reviewers:
              Jim Bosch
              Watchers:
              Jim Bosch, Lauren MacArthur, Tim Jenness, Yusra AlSayyad
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.