Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: meas_astrom
-
Labels:
-
Story Points:42
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:DRP S21b, DRP S22A, DRP S22B, DRP S23A
-
Team:Data Release Production
-
Urgent?:No
Description
(Stealing language from the related DM-30921) As per our discussion at the June 28th Metrics Meeting in order to more gently handle known types of irrecoverable single-frame processing astrometry failures, we should set the WCS of any detector for which the SFM astrometric fit failed to None and allow processing to continue. These will now warn instead of Raising.
Attachments
Issue Links
- blocks
-
DM-30922 Jointcal should be able to handle None for input skyWcs and photoCalib
- To Do
- is triggering
-
DM-36486 Remove deprecated prepareCalibratedExposures function from MakeWarpTask
- To Do
- relates to
-
DM-30928 Set photoCalib to None for failed photometric fit
- To Do
-
DM-36415 Run a full DRP on RC2 with forced astrometry failures
- To Do
-
DM-31054 Make aggregation steps robust to expected failures in RC2/DC2
- Done
-
DM-37497 Updates to LATISS's DRP.yaml pipeline through coadd processing
- Done
-
DM-36415 Run a full DRP on RC2 with forced astrometry failures
- To Do
-
DM-30921 Gen3 MakeWarpTask should skip a detector with no wcs/photocalib
- Done
Alrighty, I think this is finally ready for you to start having a look. Note that all my branches are circa w_2022_30. I realize I already have some rebasing to do, but wanted to give you the same branches as were run for my RC2 DRP battle testing with that weekly. There are at least two things that will get impacted on rebase. One is just that all the gen2 adaptions will just go away (with all the exorcising you and Tim have been up to lately!), so feel free to skip over those. The other is the turning on of the new image differencing task that I believe is now on main. I will test that by rerunning the appropriate steps based off my u/lauren/
DM-30927_bps collection. If you'd prefer to review from rebased-to-current-main branches, let me know!Oh, and my step4 is making good progress. All of the following had 100% success rate:
imageDifference had 30 failures which all look to be the same as what Brock sees (e.g. on DM-35609). The rest are chugging along...