Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: utils
-
Labels:None
-
Team:External
-
Urgent?:No
Description
Some time ago, I added some decorators for use in tests (DM-22199). One thing that has annoyed me is that sometimes I want the cartesian product of the parameters I supply, but the current decorators require spelling out all the combinations. I've now implemented versions that will do the product, and would like to add these as well.
Attachments
Activity
Maybe we could relax the dev guide rules a little and say that whilst we prefer unittest that there are some scenarios where it might be simpler to use pytest?
May I merge this, and update the dev guide?
Paul Price
added a comment - May I merge this, and update the dev guide? I think we'd like to start moving to pytest. I will file an RFC to that effect. In the meantime, I think it's best for you to merge this but not update the Dev Guide. You can use this, but we will not recommend it for others to use pending the pytest RFC.
Merged utils only.
Thanks, both!
Paul Price
added a comment - Merged utils only.
Thanks, both! 
https://docs.pytest.org/en/6.2.x/usage.html#dropping-to-pdb-python-debugger-on-failures