Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-31352

Add more DP0.2 details to RTN-001

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Story
    • Status: Done
    • Resolution: Done
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Ops Middleware
    • No

    Description

      Add the DP0.2 high level workflow 

      Attachments

        Activity

          yusra may you please review? I'm trying to decide on what will be run in DP0.2 and make a processing plan.  Also if some pipelines are left to be decided I'd like to list them explicitly in the "open issues". 
           
          I'm not very sure about the "step5" and have some questions there. 

          hchiang2 Hsin-Fang Chiang added a comment - yusra may you please review? I'm trying to decide on what will be run in DP0.2 and make a processing plan.  Also if some pipelines are left to be decided I'd like to list them explicitly in the "open issues".    I'm not very sure about the "step5" and have some questions there. 
          hchiang2 Hsin-Fang Chiang added a comment - See https://rtn-001.lsst.io/v/DM-31352/RTN-001.pdf  Section 2.1.4

          This looks very good It will be great to get some updates from Yusra. You also raise the question of multiple versions of the pipeline being used which is a great issue to explore with DP0.2.

          womullan Wil O'Mullane added a comment - This looks very good It will be great to get some updates from Yusra. You also raise the question of multiple versions of the pipeline being used which is a great issue to explore with DP0.2.

          Thank you yusra for reviewing.

          ctslater, may you please take a look too? In particular, I'm making some statements about faro getting included together with other DRP steps. We aren't planning to run separate faro steps, so work is needed to add faro tasks into the DRP.yaml file. I want to make sure that sounds okay to you (and lguy too). We are thinking of a timeline of freezing these high level workflow steps in early Oct. Is that feasible? Also, if there are other tasks not included already, it'd be great to know them soon.

          Please see https://rtn-001.lsst.io/v/DM-31352/RTN-001.pdf Sect 2.1.4

          hchiang2 Hsin-Fang Chiang added a comment - Thank you yusra for reviewing. ctslater , may you please take a look too? In particular, I'm making some statements about faro getting included together with other DRP steps. We aren't planning to run separate faro steps, so work is needed to add faro tasks into the DRP.yaml file. I want to make sure that sounds okay to you (and lguy too). We are thinking of a timeline of freezing these high level workflow steps in early Oct. Is that feasible? Also, if there are other tasks not included already, it'd be great to know them soon. Please see https://rtn-001.lsst.io/v/DM-31352/RTN-001.pdf Sect 2.1.4
          ctslater Colin Slater added a comment -

          Text looks good to me, and I agree with the statements re: faro inclusion in the DRP yaml and not a separate pipeline.

          ctslater Colin Slater added a comment - Text looks good to me, and I agree with the statements re: faro inclusion in the DRP yaml and not a separate pipeline.

          People

            hchiang2 Hsin-Fang Chiang
            hchiang2 Hsin-Fang Chiang
            Colin Slater
            Colin Slater, Hsin-Fang Chiang, Leanne Guy, Wil O'Mullane, Yusra AlSayyad
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Jenkins

                No builds found.