Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-33361

Implement versioned camera assembly

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: In Progress
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: afw, ip_isr
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Prototype an approach to the "versioned cameras" concept that allows camera definitions and datasets to be unversioned (representing a "nominal camera"), with all versioned quantities stored in IsrCalib objects in data repositories; that versioned content will be added to the Camera object on read via new factory classes/methods.

      This ticket is prep work for an RFC on the topic, which will include much more detail on the plan and philosophy; I just want to work through some open questions by trying to code pieces of them first.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            No builds found.
            jbosch Jim Bosch created issue -
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Status To Do [ 10001 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Story Points 2 6
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Link This issue relates to RFC-842 [ RFC-842 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30543 [ 511201 ] DM-30551 [ 511217 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-30551 [ 511217 ] DM-32153 [ 779823 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-32153 [ 779823 ] DM-32161 [ 779857 ]
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Summary Prototype versioned camera assembly Finish versioned camera assembly
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Summary Finish versioned camera assembly Implement versioned camera assembly
            Hide
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment -

            I'm repurposing this ticket as an implementation ticket for RFC-842, since the prototype was never going to be merged on its own anyway.

            I believe much of the code on the prototype is still valid, but there's a lot more work to do to implement the final RFC proposal (which I won't bother repeating here).

            Note to self: current story-point estimate reflects work already done, back in the prototyping phase.

            Show
            jbosch Jim Bosch added a comment - I'm repurposing this ticket as an implementation ticket for RFC-842 , since the prototype was never going to be merged on its own anyway. I believe much of the code on the prototype is still valid, but there's a lot more work to do to implement the final RFC proposal (which I won't bother repeating here). Note to self: current story-point estimate reflects work already done, back in the prototyping phase.
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Link This issue relates to RFC-842 [ RFC-842 ]
            jbosch Jim Bosch made changes -
            Link This issue is triggered by RFC-842 [ RFC-842 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-32161 [ 779857 ] DM-32168 [ 779882 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-32168 [ 779882 ] DM-32175 [ 779899 ]
            yusra Yusra AlSayyad made changes -
            Epic Link DM-32175 [ 779899 ] DM-32182 [ 779906 ]

              People

              Assignee:
              jbosch Jim Bosch
              Reporter:
              jbosch Jim Bosch
              Watchers:
              Jim Bosch, Robert Lupton
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.