Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-33659

AuxTel observing sequence for Feb 2022 run

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Done
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ts_aos
    • Labels:
    • Story Points:
      1
    • Team:
      Telescope and Site

      Description

      Propose the observing sequence for upcoming auxTel run, including needed calibration files.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak added a comment - - edited

          The draft notebook https://github.com/suberlak/AOS/blob/main/AOS_DM-33111_auxTel_data_reduction.ipynb. It will be updated to work on the `develop` branch of `ts_wep` once PR121 is merged, and then moved to https://github.com/lsst-ts/ts_analysis_notebooks/tree/develop/notebooks/auxtel

          The ISR for November observations used collections in `LATISS/raw/all,LATISS/calib,u/czw/DM-28920/calib.20210720`, which included the following ISR settings:

          isr:
                  class: lsst.ip.isr.isrTask.IsrTask
                  config:
                    connections.outputExposure: postISRCCD
                    doApplyGains: false
                    doBias: true
                    doBrighterFatter: false
                    doCrosstalk: false
                    doDark: true
                    doDefect: false
                    doFlat: true
                    doFringe: true
                    doInterpolate: true
                    doLinearize: false
                    doNanMasking: false
                    doOverscan: true
                    doVariance: false
                    python: OverscanCorrectionTask.ConfigClass.fitType = 'MEDIAN_PER_ROW'
          

          Show
          ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak added a comment - - edited The draft notebook https://github.com/suberlak/AOS/blob/main/AOS_DM-33111_auxTel_data_reduction.ipynb . It will be updated to work on the `develop` branch of `ts_wep` once PR121 is merged, and then moved to https://github.com/lsst-ts/ts_analysis_notebooks/tree/develop/notebooks/auxtel The ISR for November observations used collections in `LATISS/raw/all,LATISS/calib,u/czw/ DM-28920 /calib.20210720`, which included the following ISR settings: isr: class : lsst.ip.isr.isrTask.IsrTask config: connections.outputExposure: postISRCCD doApplyGains: false doBias: true doBrighterFatter: false doCrosstalk: false doDark: true doDefect: false doFlat: true doFringe: true doInterpolate: true doLinearize: false doNanMasking: false doOverscan: true doVariance: false python: OverscanCorrectionTask.ConfigClass.fitType = 'MEDIAN_PER_ROW'
          Hide
          ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak added a comment - - edited

          Thus ideally for calibration we would have Bias, Dark, Flats. If flats are not available, then we can use the `doApplyGains` instead.

          There are three ways to detect donuts, depending on the fidelity of the WCS information attached to the exposure.

          1) WCS is within ~10 px - can use that directly to get sources from the reference catalog : only defocal images needed
          2) WCS is within ~100 px + rotation > 6deg - too much as a starting point for astrometry : need in-focus image to run sourceDetectionTask and find WCS from astrometryTask. The donuts at defocal images are used at that positions
          3) WCS is within or more than 100 px off (or not available at all) - use donut template fitting: only defocal images needed

          Suggested sequence would be in-focus, extra-focal, intra-focal, similar to https://confluence.lsstcorp.org/display/LSSTCOM/2021-11-04+Aux-Tel+Night+Log . Since in cases 1) and 2) the in-focus source position is used for selecting defocal donut location, it would be ideal to minimize the telescope movement between in-focus and defocal exposures (i.e. take several in-focus+defocal sequences:

          intra-focal #1, extra-focal #1, in-focus #1
          intra-focal #2, extra-focal #2, in-focus #2

          etc.

          Rather than
          intra-focal #1, intra-focal #2, intra-focal #3,
          in-focus #1, in-focus #2, in-focus #3,
          extra-focal #1, extra-focal #2, extra-focal #3
          etc.

          (unless in the latter case the pointing does not dither drastically)

          Show
          ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak added a comment - - edited Thus ideally for calibration we would have Bias, Dark, Flats. If flats are not available, then we can use the `doApplyGains` instead. There are three ways to detect donuts, depending on the fidelity of the WCS information attached to the exposure. 1) WCS is within ~10 px - can use that directly to get sources from the reference catalog : only defocal images needed 2) WCS is within ~100 px + rotation > 6deg - too much as a starting point for astrometry : need in-focus image to run sourceDetectionTask and find WCS from astrometryTask. The donuts at defocal images are used at that positions 3) WCS is within or more than 100 px off (or not available at all) - use donut template fitting: only defocal images needed Suggested sequence would be in-focus, extra-focal, intra-focal, similar to https://confluence.lsstcorp.org/display/LSSTCOM/2021-11-04+Aux-Tel+Night+Log . Since in cases 1) and 2) the in-focus source position is used for selecting defocal donut location, it would be ideal to minimize the telescope movement between in-focus and defocal exposures (i.e. take several in-focus+defocal sequences: intra-focal #1, extra-focal #1, in-focus #1 intra-focal #2, extra-focal #2, in-focus #2 etc. Rather than intra-focal #1, intra-focal #2, intra-focal #3, in-focus #1, in-focus #2, in-focus #3, extra-focal #1, extra-focal #2, extra-focal #3 etc. (unless in the latter case the pointing does not dither drastically)

            People

            Assignee:
            ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak
            Reporter:
            ksuberlak Krzysztof Suberlak
            Reviewers:
            Tiago Ribeiro
            Watchers:
            Andrew Connolly, Krzysztof Suberlak, Patrick Ingraham, Tiago Ribeiro
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Due:
              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Start date:

                Jenkins

                No builds found.