Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Won't Fix
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: obs_cfht, obs_decam, obs_subaru, pipe_tasks
-
Labels:
-
Story Points:2
Description
The ingestImages.py bin script provides a camera-agnostic manner of creating a data repository (including a registry). The back-end code resides in pipe_tasks under the name ingest.py, and the IngestTask._DefaultName = "ingest", which means that configuration files in obs packages are also named ingest.py. This choice of name was unfortunate, as it may be confused with ingest of sources into the database. We should change the name to reduce this confusion, perhaps ingestImages.py like the bin script.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is triggered by
-
- Retired
Activity
Paul Price are we ever going to do this or should we abandon RFC-83?
Jim Bosch, does this still make sense in the context of Gen3?
Paul Price
added a comment - Jim Bosch , does this still make sense in the context of Gen3? Gen3 already calls its version "RawIngestTask", which I think is probably sufficient to avoid confusion.
So can we abandon this, and simply let the confusion die with Gen2?
Paul Price
added a comment - So can we abandon this, and simply let the confusion die with Gen2? We (Nate & Chris M) vote yes.
Suppose I should RFC this...
RFC-83.