I've attached the notebook and summary comparison from the PTC analysis of the v25 and v26 sequencers. The exposures used are listed in the log above, but to be explicit, the v25 sequencer data has values
SEQNAME SEQCKSUM ODP AP0_RC
|
FP_ITL_2s_ir2_v25.seq 2552520002 26.9 14.0
|
and the v26 sequencer data has
FP_ITL_2s_ir2_v26.seq 980618532 26.9 14.0
|
There is a gain difference between the two, with v25 having gain values around 1.5, and v26 having values around 1.3 (~20% difference). The PTC turnoff is lower in v26 as well, by about 5%. There were PTC failures for three of the amplifiers in the v25 run, likely due to the input data having worse spacing and more saturated inputs.
Story
Christopher Waters
I've attached the notebook and summary comparison from the PTC analysis of the v25 and v26 sequencers. The exposures used are listed in the log above, but to be explicit, the v25 sequencer data has values
SEQNAME SEQCKSUM ODP AP0_RCand the v26 sequencer data has
There is a gain difference between the two, with v25 having gain values around 1.5, and v26 having values around 1.3 (~20% difference). The PTC turnoff is lower in v26 as well, by about 5%. There were PTC failures for three of the amplifiers in the v25 run, likely due to the input data having worse spacing and more saturated inputs.