Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-3887

Review ICD flowdown to DMSR and design documents

    Details

    • Epic Name:
      ICD flowdown to DMSR
    • Story Points:
      8
    • WBS:
      02C.02.02
    • Team:
      Architecture
    • Cycle:
      Extra 2016

      Description

      This epic will result in a plan for how DM will manage the ICD requirements and their relationship to LSE-61 (DMSR). This plan should make it easier for authors of design documents to understand which requirements are relevant.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          gpdf Gregory Dubois-Felsmann added a comment -

          This work is being moved to X16 and will be addressed in the context of the working groups established in March 2016, and together with other work on the overall requirements flowdown for DM.

          Show
          gpdf Gregory Dubois-Felsmann added a comment - This work is being moved to X16 and will be addressed in the context of the working groups established in March 2016, and together with other work on the overall requirements flowdown for DM.
          Hide
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

          By "ICD" do we mean requirements flowdown from OSS and DPDD? Is this the same thing as I put in my DM-6180 epic or something different?

          Show
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - By "ICD" do we mean requirements flowdown from OSS and DPDD? Is this the same thing as I put in my DM-6180 epic or something different?
          Hide
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

          I'm still confused by this epic. Given this was assigned to a WBS and a cycle (X16) but is still open, does that mean that we showed variance on this? Was this epic meant to cover DPDD+OSS flowdown to DMSR or were there specific ICD documents that I'm meant to be looking at and incorporate into DMSR?

          Also, Mario Juric is assigned to this epic but it's on team Architecture and not team Project Science.

          Show
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - I'm still confused by this epic. Given this was assigned to a WBS and a cycle (X16) but is still open, does that mean that we showed variance on this? Was this epic meant to cover DPDD+OSS flowdown to DMSR or were there specific ICD documents that I'm meant to be looking at and incorporate into DMSR? Also, Mario Juric is assigned to this epic but it's on team Architecture and not team Project Science.
          Hide
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

          I've removed Mario Juric from this ticket.

          It seems like this ticket is related to linking DM requirements to ICDs so that we can add them to the verification matrix. The approach recommended by Kian-Tat Lim is to trace ICDs requirements to an LDM to simplify the layers of CCB approval (no reason to have to approve the same thing in two places).

          Show
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - I've removed Mario Juric from this ticket. It seems like this ticket is related to linking DM requirements to ICDs so that we can add them to the verification matrix. The approach recommended by Kian-Tat Lim is to trace ICDs requirements to an LDM to simplify the layers of CCB approval (no reason to have to approve the same thing in two places).
          Hide
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

          Gabriele Comoretto may have some insight into this ticket.

          Show
          tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - Gabriele Comoretto may have some insight into this ticket.
          Hide
          ktl Kian-Tat Lim added a comment -

          We have traced ICD requirements to DM system components in LDM-148. This enables authors of component design documents to find all relevant requirements and replicate or refine them in their own requirements documents, if such requirements documents are present. Duplicating the requirements in the DMSR is unnecessary, and a separate comprehensive LDM-level requirements document is duplicative. All DMSR and ICD requirements should be tested in LDM-639.

          Show
          ktl Kian-Tat Lim added a comment - We have traced ICD requirements to DM system components in LDM-148. This enables authors of component design documents to find all relevant requirements and replicate or refine them in their own requirements documents, if such requirements documents are present. Duplicating the requirements in the DMSR is unnecessary, and a separate comprehensive LDM-level requirements document is duplicative. All DMSR and ICD requirements should be tested in LDM-639.

            People

            • Assignee:
              ktl Kian-Tat Lim
              Reporter:
              gpdf Gregory Dubois-Felsmann
              Watchers:
              Gabriele Comoretto, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Jacek Becla, Kian-Tat Lim, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Summary Panel