This is actually going to be all of the remaining algorithms, as they are all tested with the same framework

Because it is convenient to do so now, I have tested the following in addition to the main four (DM-445)

GaussianFlux
NaiveFlux
classification
PixelFlags
skycoord

The meas_base algorithms were tested again the meas_algorithms using the test scripts in contrib/measComparison.git. The results over 4 different exposures from the measMosaicData set were identical, with the exception of PsfFlux. The tests were run with and without the configs.py configuration file, which alters the algorithm configs from defaults.

I am making the fixing of this bug part of the review process.

test1.py tests GaussianFlux, PsfFlux, SincFlux, and NaiveFlux

test3.py tests skycoord, PixelFlags, classification

classification fails in a few instances because of PsfFlux.

The PsfFlux problems are as follows:

1. An up to .1% variation in the flux measurement.
2. A much larger variation in the flux error.
3. A few cases where the old algorithm throws out and set the failure flag when the new algorithm does not. You can see these by running test3.py, since they show up in the test of classification

My understanding is that the code for this branch was combined with that of DM-445 on the tickets/DM-445 branches, so it's been reviewed as well. If that's not the case, please put this back into "In Review", and let me know what to look at.