Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Done
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Templates:
    • Story Points:
      2
    • Sprint:
      Science Pipelines DM-W16-6, DRP W16-7
    • Team:
      Data Release Production

      Description

      Some mask planes – CROSSTALK, NOT_DEBLENDED – do not need to be propagated to coadds. Add an option to remove them.

      This is a port of work performed on HSC-1174 and HSC-1294.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

          Nate Lust – reminder re release notes!

          Show
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Nate Lust – reminder re release notes!
          Hide
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

          Nate Lust – another reminder re release notes!

          Show
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Nate Lust – another reminder re release notes!
          Hide
          nlust Nate Lust added a comment -

          added

          Show
          nlust Nate Lust added a comment - added
          Hide
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited

          Thanks.

          Your note tells us that "by default the list only contains the CROSSTALK mask plane". But: the code and this issue mention the NOT_DEBLENDED plane as well. Is that a mistake? (And if so, is the code or the note mistaken?)

          Show
          swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited Thanks. Your note tells us that "by default the list only contains the CROSSTALK mask plane". But: the code and this issue mention the NOT_DEBLENDED plane as well. Is that a mistake? (And if so, is the code or the note mistaken?)
          Hide
          nlust Nate Lust added a comment -

          Updated to reflect both. When writing the release notes I looked at a specific SHA and not the HEAD of the branch, so I missed the fact that the other was added.

          Show
          nlust Nate Lust added a comment - Updated to reflect both. When writing the release notes I looked at a specific SHA and not the HEAD of the branch, so I missed the fact that the other was added.

            People

            • Assignee:
              nlust Nate Lust
              Reporter:
              swinbank John Swinbank
              Reviewers:
              Bob Armstrong
              Watchers:
              Bob Armstrong, John Swinbank, Nate Lust
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development

                  Agile