Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-5737

Upgrade the git-lfs server protocol

    Details

    • Type: Story
    • Status: Done
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The git-lfs server protocol needs to be upgrade to support the batch protocol. This is required to get support from the git-lfs core team and to keep up with the client which will deprecate v1 API in the near future.

      See:

      https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/README.md?utm_source=gitlfs_site&utm_medium=api_spec_link&utm_campaign=gitlfs

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jhoblitt Joshua Hoblitt added a comment -

            I don't think this is going to happen as part of sqre-ci-four. I assume this is safe to push into W16?

            Show
            jhoblitt Joshua Hoblitt added a comment - I don't think this is going to happen as part of sqre-ci-four. I assume this is safe to push into W16?
            Hide
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

            API docs for git-lfs 1.x can be found here: https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/tree/v1.5.5/docs/api
            API docs for git-lfs 2.x can be found here: https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api

            Show
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - API docs for git-lfs 1.x can be found here: https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/tree/v1.5.5/docs/api API docs for git-lfs 2.x can be found here: https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api
            Hide
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

            The schemas for v1.3 and v2.0 should be compatible. They use the same required fields.

            Show
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - The schemas for v1.3 and v2.0 should be compatible. They use the same required fields.
            Hide
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

            Working as expected at https://git-lfs-test.lsst.codes. I'm testing now looking for issues.

            Show
            jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - Working as expected at https://git-lfs-test.lsst.codes . I'm testing now looking for issues.

              People

              • Assignee:
                jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive)
                Reporter:
                jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive)
                Reviewers:
                Joshua Hoblitt
                Watchers:
                Frossie Economou, J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive), Jonathan Sick, Joshua Hoblitt
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Summary Panel