Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-7051

conda installation from the stack channel brings in astropy 1.2

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Won't Fix
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      If you do a conda install of lsst_sims from http://conda.lsst.codes/sims you get astropy-1.1.1. If you do the same install from http://conda.lsst.codes/stack you get astropy-1.2.1. This is a problem for the sims stack since the sncosmo package (on which we depend for our simulations of supernova light curves) is sensitive to which version of astropy you are running.

      Was it intentional that the two channels deliver different versions of astropy?

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          danielsf Scott Daniel added a comment -

          As far as I know, the lsst_sims that ships with version 12.0 of the stack will still have problems with astropy 1.2. If we have move beyond version 12.0, I think we should be okay. Rahul Biswas would know better, though, as he is the local sncosmo expert.

          Show
          danielsf Scott Daniel added a comment - As far as I know, the lsst_sims that ships with version 12.0 of the stack will still have problems with astropy 1.2. If we have move beyond version 12.0, I think we should be okay. Rahul Biswas would know better, though, as he is the local sncosmo expert.
          Hide
          rbiswas Rahul Biswas added a comment - - edited

          Is the proposal to move to later versions of astropy 1.2 or try to stick to 1.1 ?

          We upgraded sncosmo to version 1.3 in the master on July 11 https://github.com/lsst/sncosmo/tree/master/upstream. I am not sure if this is part of the release you are mentioning.

          SNcosmo Version 1.3 is compatible with astropy v 1.2. So, if the idea is to use 1.2 we are good (Once confirmed that this is what the proposal is, I will actually check that this works correctly). We can go forward to an even later sncosmo release (including the extinction package which Scott Daniel had agreed to).

          Show
          rbiswas Rahul Biswas added a comment - - edited Is the proposal to move to later versions of astropy 1.2 or try to stick to 1.1 ? We upgraded sncosmo to version 1.3 in the master on July 11 https://github.com/lsst/sncosmo/tree/master/upstream . I am not sure if this is part of the release you are mentioning. SNcosmo Version 1.3 is compatible with astropy v 1.2. So, if the idea is to use 1.2 we are good (Once confirmed that this is what the proposal is, I will actually check that this works correctly). We can go forward to an even later sncosmo release (including the extinction package which Scott Daniel had agreed to).
          Hide
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          If sims is compatible with 1.2 then this shouldn't be a problem for any future conda builds. I'm going to change the status to won't fix.

          Show
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - If sims is compatible with 1.2 then this shouldn't be a problem for any future conda builds. I'm going to change the status to won't fix.
          Hide
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          We can always open a new ticket with more specific behavior that is needed for sims.

          Show
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - We can always open a new ticket with more specific behavior that is needed for sims.
          Hide
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          Any future sims conda builds should be compatible with astropy 1.2.

          Show
          jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive) added a comment - Any future sims conda builds should be compatible with astropy 1.2.

            People

            • Assignee:
              jmatt J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              danielsf Scott Daniel
              Watchers:
              J Matt Peterson [X] (Inactive), Lynne Jones, Rahul Biswas, Scott Daniel
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Summary Panel