Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-8017

There is a difference in how the background is being modeled in py2 and py3.

    Details

    • Epic Name:
      Fix background modeling precision problem
    • Team:
      Data Release Production

      Description

      Figure out why the background modeling differs in py2 and py3, write a new meas_algorithms test to catch the discrepancy, and put the pipe_tasks assertion thresholds in testProcessCcd back to smaller, more reasonable values. This problem was initially described in this Community post.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          Stories in Epic (Custom Issue Matrix)

          Key Summary Story Points Assignee Status
           
          DM-8031

          Add a test to verify the background model is created correctly

          Unassigned Won't Fix

            Activity

            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            Adopting this for DRP per discussion with Simon Krughoff.

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Adopting this for DRP per discussion with Simon Krughoff .
            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited

            Meredith Rawls: I believe I have a fix for the problem here. Since this epic isn't scheduled for work in the current cycle, I propose to shift the stories DM-8030 & DM-8032 into the epic DM-8306 and work on them there. I'll expand the scope of those stories to include adding tests rather than handling them separately on DM-8031. I'll close this epic, and DM-8031, as "invalid". Does that work for you?

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited Meredith Rawls : I believe I have a fix for the problem here. Since this epic isn't scheduled for work in the current cycle, I propose to shift the stories DM-8030 & DM-8032 into the epic DM-8306 and work on them there. I'll expand the scope of those stories to include adding tests rather than handling them separately on DM-8031 . I'll close this epic, and DM-8031 , as "invalid". Does that work for you?
            Hide
            mrawls Meredith Rawls added a comment -

            That sounds fine, thanks for the heads up.

            Show
            mrawls Meredith Rawls added a comment - That sounds fine, thanks for the heads up.

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                mrawls Meredith Rawls
                Watchers:
                John Parejko, John Swinbank, Meredith Rawls, Simon Krughoff
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Summary Panel