Uploaded image for project: 'Data Management'
  1. Data Management
  2. DM-8017

There is a difference in how the background is being modeled in py2 and py3.

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Epic Name:
      Fix background modeling precision problem
    • Team:
      Data Release Production

      Description

      Figure out why the background modeling differs in py2 and py3, write a new meas_algorithms test to catch the discrepancy, and put the pipe_tasks assertion thresholds in testProcessCcd back to smaller, more reasonable values. This problem was initially described in this Community post.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is triggered by

          Story - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a user story. DM-7292 Port pipe_tasks to Python 3

          • Done

          Stories in Epic (Custom Issue Matrix)

          Key Summary Story Points Assignee Status
           
          		DM-8031

          Add a test to verify the background model is created correctly

          		 Unassigned Won't Fix

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            Adopting this for DRP per discussion with Simon Krughoff.

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Adopting this for DRP per discussion with Simon Krughoff .
            Hide
            Permalink
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited

            Meredith Rawls: I believe I have a fix for the problem here. Since this epic isn't scheduled for work in the current cycle, I propose to shift the stories DM-8030 & DM-8032 into the epic DM-8306 and work on them there. I'll expand the scope of those stories to include adding tests rather than handling them separately on DM-8031. I'll close this epic, and DM-8031, as "invalid". Does that work for you?

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - - edited Meredith Rawls : I believe I have a fix for the problem here. Since this epic isn't scheduled for work in the current cycle, I propose to shift the stories DM-8030 & DM-8032 into the epic DM-8306 and work on them there. I'll expand the scope of those stories to include adding tests rather than handling them separately on DM-8031 . I'll close this epic, and DM-8031 , as "invalid". Does that work for you?
            Hide
            Permalink
            mrawls Meredith Rawls added a comment -

            That sounds fine, thanks for the heads up.

            Show
            mrawls Meredith Rawls added a comment - That sounds fine, thanks for the heads up.

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              mrawls Meredith Rawls
              Watchers:
              John Parejko, John Swinbank, Meredith Rawls, Simon Krughoff
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.