Details
-
Type:
Story
-
Status: Done
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: DM Subsystem Science
-
Team:Architecture
Description
DPDD includes a URL to http://ls.st/l9u which end up going to a TRAC page talking about the Winter 2013 LSST DM Data Challenge Release Notes.
Given the current status of TRAC I don't think LSE documents should point to those URLs. Can we please consider moving this content somewhere else. I'm not entirely sure whether it should be a DM tech note or a confluence page (I'd say an LDM but it's not clear people like nicely formatted PDFs entering an archive).
Attachments
Issue Links
- is triggered by
-
- Done
Activity
I am fine with all these options - leaving it to you experts to choose the best one!
Up to Jonathan and Tim.
These are release notes, and the associated handbook was only ever in draft form, so I'd make them a DMTN but if possible also archive in DocuShare as a normal Document.
That PDF is going to be as done as it is ever going to get so we may as well archive it properly. Should the release notes be a separate "document" to the report or do we try to keep them as a single entity.
I have created DMTN-034 for the Summer 12 release notes and DMTN-035 for the Winter 13 release notes (the Winter 13 notes refer to the Summer 12 ones). They are direct ports but all the documents that were attached to the TRAC ticket were removed and the documents now refer to the corresponding documents on DocuShare (turns out that every one of those attachments had already been submitted to DocuShare).
I have not attempted to port over the installation instructions for the software versions referenced.
Jonathan Sick can you please give it a quick once over and let me know when they are published to LTD. If Zeljko Ivezic or Kian-Tat Lim could give them a quick once over when they are published that would be great.
The documents are published to https://dmtn-034.lsst.io and https://dmtn-035.lsst.io, respectively. Looks good.
These documents have been ported and Kian-Tat Lim has added text to the original source TRAC pages to indicate where the new location is. Closing this.
I'd advocate that all of the documents linked from that page (and Trac page itself) should be either an LDM and DMTN technote. DMTNs would be fine, LDM would only off the trappings of a TCT-approved document. Either series allows us to reliably archive the documents, get DOIs for citation, and have them listed in ADS for later discoverability.