Uploaded image for project: 'Request For Comments'
  1. Request For Comments
  2. RFC-338

Baseline updates to LDM-151

    Details

    • Type: RFC
    • Status: Implemented
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: DM, TCT
    • Labels:

      Description

      This RFC seeks to baseline numerous changes to the Science Pipelines (formerly, "Applications") Design document that came as a result of the Science Pipelines Definition Working Group activity.

      The changes harmonize LDM-151 with the updated DPDD (LSE-163), the present state of the science pipeline software, and future plans. They include:

      • Updated introduction to reflect the current DPDD and LDM-148
      • Updates to pipeline descriptions and workflow diagrams of Level 1 and 2 productions
      • Update to Calibration Products production to reflect current calibration plans
      • Introduction of Algorithmic Components and Software Primitives sections
      • Removal of SUI and QA sections, which have their own documents
      • Significantly increased level of detail across all areas
      • Addition of new co-authors Eric Bellm, Hsin-Fang Chiang, Steve Pietrowicz, David Reiss, Peter Yoachim.
      • Moving of Robert Lupton to head the author list, to signify that the future ownership of this document is with the Pipelines Scientist and the DM Systems Engineering team.

      Remaining know issues with this document have been recorded in DM-10481 and its child issues.

      The version of LDM-151 linked below will be considered for adoption at the DMLT F2F meeting May 9-11, 2017. Everyone is encouraged to read the document and report any issues that may rise to the level of blocking the adoption. New co-authors (Eric Bellm, Hsin-Fang Chiang, Steve Pietrowicz, David Reiss, Peter Yoachim) are required to explicitly confirm they're OK with being on the document (it's sufficient to leave a comment here stating that).

      Attachments:

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            mjuric Mario Juric added a comment -

            Just to clarify, I'm 100% fine with releasing LDM-151 as is for this RFC, and dealing with this figure change next time we change LDM-151. Don't think it rises to a "blocker" level (and sorry if that wasn't clear in my previous comment).

            Show
            mjuric Mario Juric added a comment - Just to clarify, I'm 100% fine with releasing LDM-151 as is for this RFC, and dealing with this figure change next time we change LDM-151. Don't think it rises to a "blocker" level (and sorry if that wasn't clear in my previous comment).
            Hide
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            John Swinbank asked for a couple of days delay in releasing the document so that he could give it a once over as the new owner. I'm happy to merge my figure1->table1 pull request or not when I do the release process in DM-10534.

            Show
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - John Swinbank asked for a couple of days delay in releasing the document so that he could give it a once over as the new owner. I'm happy to merge my figure1->table1 pull request or not when I do the release process in DM-10534 .
            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            Squinting at that figure (/table) confused me and led directly to DM-10540. Since Mario Juric seems content to drop it altogether, I tend to think that's what we should do, rather than reformatting it. However, I'd like to also carefully read through the text in that section and make sure it is consistent with our other documentation before we finalise the document.

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Squinting at that figure (/table) confused me and led directly to DM-10540 . Since Mario Juric seems content to drop it altogether, I tend to think that's what we should do, rather than reformatting it. However, I'd like to also carefully read through the text in that section and make sure it is consistent with our other documentation before we finalise the document.
            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            Tim Jenness — ok, let's go ahead and release this. Will you take care of that from here, or do you need anything more from me?

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - Tim Jenness — ok, let's go ahead and release this. Will you take care of that from here, or do you need anything more from me?
            Hide
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            I will do that today in DM-10534.

            Show
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - I will do that today in DM-10534 .

              People

              • Assignee:
                mjuric Mario Juric
                Reporter:
                mjuric Mario Juric
                Watchers:
                David Reiss, Eric Bellm, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Hsin-Fang Chiang, Jim Bosch, John Swinbank, Mario Juric, Merlin Fisher-Levine, Peter Yoachim, Robert Lupton, Simon Krughoff, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane, Zeljko Ivezic
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                14 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:
                  Planned End:

                  Summary Panel