Uploaded image for project: 'Request For Comments'
  1. Request For Comments
  2. RFC-561

Adopt new version of LDM-294 as baseline -Documentalist, DMCCB, Release Management, Product Tree

    Details

    • Type: RFC
    • Status: Implemented
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: DM, TCT
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      In respect to the baselined version (June 2018) following updates have been included into master:

      • Improved makeProductTree.py
      • In section 7:
        • DM System Engineering Team
        • DM configuration Control Board
      • In section 3:
        • Release Management
        • Figure 5: DM Organization

       

      The pdf of the new version is available here.

      The updated top level product tree is available here.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            I'd suggest rephrasing that point, then, given my naive reading of "and approve." Maybe "Review all RFCs prior to 'Adoption' and escalate those within DM-CCB scope" ? or similar?

            Show
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - I'd suggest rephrasing that point, then, given my naive reading of "and approve." Maybe "Review all RFCs prior to 'Adoption' and escalate those within DM-CCB scope" ? or similar?
            Hide
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            That would agree with my reading of the situation but I'd like Wil O'Mullane to comment before Gabriele Comoretto makes the change.

            Show
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - That would agree with my reading of the situation but I'd like Wil O'Mullane to comment before Gabriele Comoretto makes the change.
            Hide
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            Eric Bellm, I have re-read the text in the document (thanks Gabriele Comoretto) and it says:

            Review all RFCs and approves flagged RFCs prior to ’Adoption’.

            which is not quite what you mention above. This is consistent with what I thought we were saying.

            Show
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - Eric Bellm , I have re-read the text in the document (thanks Gabriele Comoretto ) and it says: Review all RFCs and approves flagged RFCs prior to ’Adoption’. which is not quite what you mention above. This is consistent with what I thought we were saying.
            Hide
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            Tim Jenness I apologize, I was looking at the docushare-v9 diff and didn't realize it had changed in the most recent version--I agree that the current wording is fine.

            Show
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - Tim Jenness I apologize, I was looking at the docushare-v9 diff and didn't realize it had changed in the most recent version--I agree that the current wording is fine.
            Hide
            womullan Wil O'Mullane added a comment -

            Lets get the new version out and close this.

            Show
            womullan Wil O'Mullane added a comment - Lets get the new version out and close this.

              People

              • Assignee:
                gcomoretto Gabriele Comoretto
                Reporter:
                gcomoretto Gabriele Comoretto
                Watchers:
                Eric Bellm, Gabriele Comoretto, John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:
                  Planned End:

                  Summary Panel