Per my comments on
DM-16947, I still don't understand the apparent change to the remit of the DM-CCB here — we go from “scope restricted to the DM subsystem” to “focused on the DM subsystem”. This seems to imply the DM-CCB might sometimes do things that aren't relevant to DM... is that the intention?
DM-16947, most T/CAMs don't have deputies, so suggesting that they delegate to them seems unfortunate.
And again per
DM-16947, as of today LDM-564 doesn't describe a meaningful release plan. I think it would be appropriate (and in keeping with its title!) to convert LDM-564 into a release plan, but that work hasn't happened. Until it does, I don't think we should baseline a version of LDM-294 which asserts that LDM-564 describes a release plan.
(Why do I say LDM-564 isn't a release plan? Because e.g. the following don't correspond to releases:
- Science Platform with WISE data in PDAC
- HSC reprocessing
- Alert generation validation
- AuxTel DAQ integration functionality test
- Aux Tel DAQ interface Integration Verification and Spectrograph Operations Rehearsal
- Alert distribution validation
It might be ok to approve this document as is, if a ticket were filed and cited in the document to describe the work of converting LDM-564 into a release plan.)