Uploaded image for project: 'Request For Comments'
  1. Request For Comments
  2. RFC-561

Adopt new version of LDM-294 as baseline -Documentalist, DMCCB, Release Management, Product Tree

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • RFC
    • Status: Implemented
    • Resolution: Done
    • DM, TCT
    • None

    Description

      In respect to the baselined version (June 2018) following updates have been included into master:

      • Improved makeProductTree.py
      • In section 7:
        • DM System Engineering Team
        • DM configuration Control Board
      • In section 3:
        • Release Management
        • Figure 5: DM Organization

       

      The pdf of the new version is available here.

      The updated top level product tree is available here.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            I'd suggest rephrasing that point, then, given my naive reading of "and approve." Maybe "Review all RFCs prior to 'Adoption' and escalate those within DM-CCB scope" ? or similar?

            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - I'd suggest rephrasing that point, then, given my naive reading of "and approve." Maybe "Review all RFCs prior to 'Adoption' and escalate those within DM-CCB scope" ? or similar?
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            That would agree with my reading of the situation but I'd like womullan to comment before gcomoretto makes the change.

            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - That would agree with my reading of the situation but I'd like womullan to comment before gcomoretto makes the change.
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            ebellm, I have re-read the text in the document (thanks gcomoretto) and it says:

            Review all RFCs and approves flagged RFCs prior to ’Adoption’.

            which is not quite what you mention above. This is consistent with what I thought we were saying.

            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - ebellm , I have re-read the text in the document (thanks gcomoretto ) and it says: Review all RFCs and approves flagged RFCs prior to ’Adoption’. which is not quite what you mention above. This is consistent with what I thought we were saying.
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            tjenness I apologize, I was looking at the docushare-v9 diff and didn't realize it had changed in the most recent version--I agree that the current wording is fine.

            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - tjenness I apologize, I was looking at the docushare-v9 diff and didn't realize it had changed in the most recent version--I agree that the current wording is fine.

            Lets get the new version out and close this.

            womullan Wil O'Mullane added a comment - Lets get the new version out and close this.

            People

              gcomoretto Gabriele Comoretto [X] (Inactive)
              gcomoretto Gabriele Comoretto [X] (Inactive)
              Eric Bellm, Gabriele Comoretto [X] (Inactive), John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Planned End:

                Jenkins

                  No builds found.