Uploaded image for project: 'Request For Comments'
  1. Request For Comments
  2. RFC-592

Accept updated LDM-612 and LDM-682 as a baseline

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

      Description

      Minor updates to LDM-612 and LDM-682 to provide cross-references and further information about the LSST broker workshop.

      Docushare: https://docushare.lsst.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Version-58889/LDM-612.pdf

      and https://docushare.lsst.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Version-58888/LDM-682.pdf

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment -

            I worry about the semantics of rebaselining LDM-682 — what does it mean to change a call that has already been issued?

            The tense in the LDM-612 seems awkward — the call “is issued”? Surely was issued? or has been issued?

            However, these changes are sufficiently minor that I think we should just accept them without wasting too much time quibbling.

            Show
            swinbank John Swinbank added a comment - I worry about the semantics of rebaselining LDM-682 — what does it mean to change a call that has already been issued? The tense in the LDM-612 seems awkward — the call “ is issued”? Surely was issued? or has been issued? However, these changes are sufficiently minor that I think we should just accept them without wasting too much time quibbling.
            Hide
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            The only change to the LOI call (apologies for forgetting \newtext again) was to put the broker workshop dates in the document and link to the broker workshop website. We're doing another round of announcements and it seemed worthwhile to update it.

            Show
            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - The only change to the LOI call (apologies for forgetting \newtext again) was to put the broker workshop dates in the document and link to the broker workshop website. We're doing another round of announcements and it seemed worthwhile to update it.

              People

              Assignee:
              ebellm Eric Bellm
              Reporter:
              ebellm Eric Bellm
              Watchers:
              Eric Bellm, John Swinbank, Leanne Guy, Tim Jenness
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Planned End:

                  Jenkins

                  No builds found.