No problem with this - not obvious we need to fla git but it I suppose it is a new Change Control Document.

Leanne Guy has agreed to review this before we approve.

Looks good. I have some requests for changes.

1) This is a verification document and should not include details of test cases associated with the verification elements. All sub-sub-sections of section 2 sub-sections should be removed and instead, just a list of the associated test cases (as per the 'test Case Summary'), with perhaps the test case objective added. The predecessors, prerequisites and test personnel are not appropriate in a verification document, and belong instead in the test specification

2) The objective of many of the test cases included is not an objective but rather is a detailed description of how to execute the test case. All test case objectives should be rewritten to be short clear statements of the objective and the details of how to execute the test moved to the test script. E.g 2.4.1 [LVV-T186] Objective should be reduced to something like: "Test the summit to base network reliability without physically cutting network", and then all the other details moved to the test script

After the Network Engineering Team provides their final comments (sometime after April 9 NET meeting) I will incorporate those changes and Gabrielel and I will make the recommended restructuring.

Thank you

Leanne Guy, LDM-732 has been updated accordingly. I update the generation tool in order to include in the document only the relevant VE information. Jeff Kantor updated the test cases content.

Please have a look to https://ldm-732.lsst.io/v/RFC-674/index.html and let me know if OK.

The first point has been addressed satisfactorily. Concerning point 2, I have added some comments in the PR that should be addressed.

I think I have addressed all comments. Please see:

https://ldm-732.lsst.io/v/RFC-674/index.html

I hope we are ready to go now.

Thanks - all comments addressed now

Thanks Leanne! And many thanks to Gabrielle for all his support!

It sounds like we can now board recommend this.