Uploaded image for project: 'Request For Comments'
  1. Request For Comments
  2. RFC-677

Proposed LCR re. Special Programs prompt processing

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • RFC
    • Status: Implemented
    • Resolution: Done
    • DM

    Description

      We seek comments on the following draft LCR, which was developed in DM-12576.

       

      The purpose of this LCR is to revise LSE-72 to clarify that the survey name (e.g., WFD, DDF-1) should be included in the definition of nextVisit, in order ensure that the correct mechanisms will be in place to meet requirements OSS-REQ-0384 and DMS-REQ-0320, which specify that alternative processing pipelines can be triggered for Special Programs data in near real-time. A short, associated, clarifying revision to LSE-61 is also proposed.

      ID: OCS-DM-COM-ICD-0031
      Changes:
      Update the specification so that the second sentence, which describes the visit qualities reported to DM, include survey name: "The notice shall include the sky coordinates ... filter selection, expected air mass, and survey name (e.g., WFD, DDF-1)."
      Add a sentence to the discussion: "The inclusion of survey name in the visit qualities reported in an advance notice will enable alternative, near real-time processing pipelines to be triggered for Special Programs, as required by OSS-REQ-0384 and DMS-REQ-0320."

      ID: DMS-REQ-0320
      Changes:
      Update the specification so that the first sentence says: "It shall be possible for special programs to trigger their own data processing recipes, during the night instead of the nightly Alert Processing (but the recipes may still issue Alerts), or on alternative timescales."
      Add this as a final sentence of the discussion: "Decisions about which processing pipelines are applied to which Special Programs will be made by the Operations team, after consideration of the scientific goals, computational resources, and data rights policy."

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment -

            Looks good to me.

            ebellm Eric Bellm added a comment - Looks good to me.
            lguy Leanne Guy added a comment -

            I support this going to LCR

            lguy Leanne Guy added a comment - I support this going to LCR

            This has been submitted as an LCR:

            https://project.lsst.org/groups/ccb/node/4036

             

            mgraham Melissa Graham added a comment - This has been submitted as an LCR: https://project.lsst.org/groups/ccb/node/4036  

            This has been passed on to the CCB via an LCR. 

            mgraham Melissa Graham added a comment - This has been passed on to the CCB via an LCR. 
            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment -

            mgraham I think you can mark this RFC implemented. There is no further action required and it's no longer under DM's control.

            tjenness Tim Jenness added a comment - mgraham I think you can mark this RFC implemented. There is no further action required and it's no longer under DM's control.

            People

              mgraham Melissa Graham
              mgraham Melissa Graham
              Colin Slater, Eric Bellm, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, John Swinbank, Kian-Tat Lim, Leanne Guy, Melissa Graham, Michelle Butler [X] (Inactive), Tiago Ribeiro, Tim Jenness, Wil O'Mullane
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              11 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Planned End:

                Jenkins

                  No builds found.